The fashionable Brick Presbyterian Church had a tradition of helping the poor. In the 19th century it established a Sunday school in the wretched Hell’s Kitchen neighborhood which, in 1888, became Christ Church. In 1905 Brick Church erected a new church building on West 36th Street with an adjoining parish house that provided the tenement dwellers recreation and, more importantly, instruction in sewing, carpentry, and other areas that would help to improve their lives.
On the opposite side of the church building at No. 322 West 36th
Street was a tenement building. Apparently to save rent, at least in once instance several unrelated
people shared a single apartment.
The lifestyles of the struggling residents was evidenced here on
November 15, 1914 when Alexander Evanoff, a Bulgarian immigrant, showed up at
the door of that flat.
Evanoff had shared the apartment with Rosie King and her
sister, Mary Kenniker, and an Italian Rocco Postorino. When he left, his place was taken by a Greek
immigrant, Mickle Stronnglous. Somewhat
smitten with Rosie King, Evanoff now envisioned the Greek as a rival for her
affections.
The following morning The New York Times reported “Sounds of quarreling, followed by four pistol shots, brought the people of the tenement
at 332 West Thirty-six Street to their doors at 6 o’clock last night in time to
see a man dash downstairs from the third floor, brandishing a revolver.”
The man was Alexander Evanoff and as he bolted down the
stairs, men and boys from the tenement ran after him. By the time he reached Ninth Avenue “a small
army was at his heels.” He turned the
corner towards 35th Street where “he was downed by Policeman Allen
of the West Thirty-seventh Street Station.”
Back at the overcrowded apartment, Mickle Stronnglous lay dead
on the floor with a bullet wound in the head.
Rocco Postorino was bleeding from the wrist and the two terrified women
cowered in another room.
They were able to tell police that Evanoff stood in the doorway
and fired directly at Stronnglous. As he
fell to the floor the Bulgarian aimed at the two women; but Postorino grabbed
his arm and the shot went wild. As the
two men grappled on the floor, Rosie and Mary fled screaming into another
room. “For more than a minute the two
men wrestled. Then Evanoff succeeded in
tearing himself free, but not until two more shots had been fired, one bullet
wounding Postorino in the wrist, the other piercing Evanoff in the hand.”
Evanoff denied that he had started the fight. He said he was out of work and stopped by to
borrow money. He insisted the others had
opened fire on him the moment he entered the room. Police were not so sure. He was held on murder charges.
At the time another social problem concerned New Yorkers—that of
safe and respectable housing for single working girls. The West 36th Street neighborhood
was not far from the developing retail area of Herald Square where massive
stores like Gimbels and Macy’s hired hundreds of “shop girls.” With the opening of Pennsylvania Station two
blocks to the south of Christ Church in 1910, businesses flooded the area. Every unmarried girl who moved to New York
for a job needed a place to stay. But
meager wages made finding respectable housing difficult. The solution was the hotel for working girls.
William Sloane Coffin controlled the properties at Nos. 330
and 332 West 36th Street in December 1915 when The Real Estate
Record & Builders’ Guide reported that Christ Church intended to erect a “7-story
dormitory” on the site. The projected
$95,000 project was to be designed by Hill & Stout.
Frederick P. Hill and Edmund C. Stout had recently completed
the skinny Gothic-inspired office building at No. 299 Madison Avenue, and the
triangular German-American Insurance Co. building on Liberty Street. For the “Barbour Dormitory” they would again
turn to the Gothic motif, handsomely blending with the Christ Church and Parish
House next door.
A month after the announcement, on January 17, 1916, the
Brick Church announced that “Nearly the entire $150,000 Barbour Memorial Fund
has been subscribed. It is for the
erection of a dormitory on the west side.” The figure would translate to about $3.25
million today.
The working girl hotel would be named in memory of William
D. Barbour who, as recorded in the 1943 Brick
Church History “for over fifty years was the teacher and devoted friend of
the children of the West Side.”
The book would remind its readers that Barbour House (as it
was quickly renamed) was erected “through the enthusiasm of William Sloane
Coffin.” Indeed, on August 23, 1916 The
Times reported that Coffin had “conveyed as a gift to the corporation of Brick
Presbyterian Church title in the two properties at 330 and 332 West
Thirty-sixth Street.”
On January 23, 1916 The New York Times reported “One of the
most interesting and what will doubtless prove to be one of the most beneficial
improvements in the rapidly growing industrial centre immediately adjacent to
the Pennsylvania Station is the home for wage-earning girls now under
construction…in the centre of the biggest retail district in the country.”
The design of the Barbour House complimented Christ Church, center, and the parish house to the right -- The New York Times, January 23, 1916 (copyright expired) |
The newspaper pointed out the lack of housing for the
enormous population of working girls in the area. William S. Coffin further explained “A large
number of employes of these stores and lofts are girls whose wages range from
$6 a week up. Now, if a girl can walk to
her work six days a week instead of taking a car, this is equal to an increase
of 10 percent in her wages. If one hour
each day in the subway be counted as a working hour, which it certainly it,
living near the store makes an eight-hour instead of a nine-hour day. A dormitory for these girls is certainly one
of the greatest needs of the district.”
A balcony over the entrance was planted with shrubs -- Architecture & Building April 1917 (copyright expired) |
The Times described the “attractive” façade as “of red brick
and white terra cotta, relieved by an artistic balcony for flowering plants
over the main entrance. It will be seven
stories in height with a roof garden.”
The term “dormitory” was perhaps more appropriate than “hotel.” The architects lined up single rooms—most of
them 7.5 by 12 feet--to accommodate 120 regular female lodgers. But life in the building was not intended to
be Spartan. In the basement was a large
kitchen and a “clubroom” for entertainments.
The main floor contained a large entrance hall, two reception rooms “where
young men and other visitors may be put at ease,” and a large lounge with an
open fire place. The main dining room,
also on this floor, could accommodate 130 at a time. The Times mentioned that the dining room “will
be one of the great features of the building, for it is intended to establish a
girls’ lunch club which will be restricted under certain conditions for the
benefit of girls working in the neighborhood.”
A lunch club would further reduce the girls’ expenses.
Rooms lined up along the hallways with a central communal restroom in the center -- http://nyre.cul.columbia.edu/images/view/60546 |
All six of the upper floors were relegated to sleeping
rooms; along with scattered trunk rooms.
On the roof was a glass-enclosed conservatory and an open roof section.
Girls staying at the Barbour House could expect to pay $4.75
a week on average. Considering that most
of them made about $6 a week, they would still be strapped for spending money.
Two years after the building opened, New-York Tribune writer
Elene Foster made a tour of working girl hotels. She wrote on January 20, 1918 “It’s a
problem which dates back to the time that the first shy little country maid
descended from the old Bouwerie stagecoach, carpet bag in hand, to seek her
fortune in the great city—this problem of the housing of the working girl!” Foster said that while times and girls had
changed, “the problem is there just the same…the problem of the safe and proper
housing of the thousands and thousands of young women who come each year to
live and work in the biggest city in the
world.”
Foster started out at the Barbour House “one of the newest
and most attractive of the organized houses for girls, over in West
Thirty-sixth Street. The applicant with
whom I went was a salesgirl in a department store, earning $10 per week. She had been ill in the hospital for several
weeks, and she had her doctor’s bill still to pay, so that she couldn’t afford
to pay $6 per week for her room and two meals (breakfast and dinner) in the
boarding house where she was living.”
So the girl was desperate to find a room in the Barbour
House. Foster recounted the girl’s
description of the place, including her vernacular and less-than-refined
diction.
“I’m just crazy to get into Barbour House. I’ve got lots of friends there. It’s perfectly elegant. They treat you white, too; course they have
rules, but ain’t what you’d call ‘nosey’ about your affairs so long as they know
you’re respectable. And they don’t mind
your gentleman friend comin’ to see you neither. They’ve got reg-lar ‘Beau Parlors’ fixed up
real class, where you can see him without a lot of other girls buttin in.”
Apparently the reporter showed confusion for the girl
continued, “You ain’t never heard of a ‘Beau Parlor’? Some call ‘em ‘spoon-holders.’ All the new houses have them. Wait till you see them. They’re grand!”
Foster agreed that the Barbour House was “perfectly elegant.” She described the long reception room with
chintz draperies and “big chintz covered chairs, books and lamps and a hue
fireplace with a broad leather covered fender.”
The reporter was impressed that there was nothing “institutional” about
the hotel.
The women rode the elevator to look at the vacant room. “It was a large room, with two big windows
hung with white curtains, and in it were three comfortable cots with brown
covers, three chests of drawers with mirrors, three rocking chairs, and along
one side three clothes closets fitted with poles and hangers, and with doors
that could be locked. The applicant’s
face fell when she saw the three cots.”
The girl had hoped for a single room rather than a shared
one. But by sharing she would be paying
only $3.75 a week including breakfast and dinner. In the basement the women were shown the
laundry, “a room equipped with ironing boards, electric irons and a row of
porcelain tubs.” For the use of the room girls paid 5 cents an
hour.
Next came a trip to the sun parlor on the roof where girls
could seek relief on hot summer nights. “Here
were wicker chairs with bright cushions, tall, shaded lamps and gate-legged
tables and a phonograph. A conservatory
with tropical plants and a big tank of goldfish opened from this sun parlor.” Also on the roof was a kitchenette where
girls could make tea or light meals.
Adding to the attraction of Barbour House at the time were
the dances for sailors hosted every Wednesday night by Christ Church next door. Sailors, either returning from war or headed
overseas, were told they “may bring their dancing partners with them or attend
singly and be introduced to some of the girls of the neighborhood who will be
there.”
There is little doubt that a great number of the “girls of
the neighborhood” walked over from the Barbour House.
Girls who could barely make rent could definitely not afford to spend
money on vacations; but in 1922 the Barbour House leased a summer house at Far
Rockaway, Long Island, for the girls. On
October 10 the girls opened a two-day bazaar in the building “to raise funds to
replenish the sums spend for their summer house,” reported The Times.
The residents need not have collected huge amounts,
however. The congregation of Brick
Church was wealthy and Brick Church
History mentioned “The gifts and contributions of the people rose to unprecedented
figures. Until the depression of 1929,
the annual budget was in the neighborhood of $130,000, the larger proportion
being devoted to missions and benevolences.”
A significant supporter of the hotel was the wealthy and unmarried
Eleanor Cuyler. Not only did she
single-handedly pay the salary of a foreign missionary, but she was nicknamed
by Brick Church members “the fairy godmother of Barbour House.”
The Depression obviously worsened the lot of working girls,
many of whom lost their jobs. The Association
to Promote Proper Housing for Girls opened its two-day conference at the Hotel
Pennsylvania on November 18, 1930. The organization
intended to address “problems of unemployment among girls, consideration of
mental adjustments in the allocation of positions, and the social trends of
modern times.” The first night’s session was an oratorical contest
in which girls spoke on “What I Know of Unemployment.”
Barbour House did well for itself. Resident Dorothy Barry received the first
prize, a gold medal; and the House received a silver cup “which will become the
permanent property of the club whose representatives attain first place for
three years,” reported The Times.
Interestingly, unlike most hotels for women, Barbour House
accepted older single women as well.
Former European opera singer Marie Van Gelder was 55-years old when she
checked into the House in July 1935 with her two sisters. A native of The Netherlands, Marie was a
naturalized American citizen.
Marie Van Gelder now made her living as a private vocal
coach. She sprang from a musical family—her
father Gerardus M. Van Gelder was a prominent Dutch musicial and her brother,
Dr. Martius Van Gelder, was a pianist, violinist and composer living in
Philadelphia. Marie had been first
dramatic soprano at the Royal Opera House in Amsterdam, and sang with the Berne,
Zurich and Metz opera houses. She gave
command concerts for Queen Wilhelmina and Kaiser Wilhelm II; and wrote the book
Artistic Singing.
On October 13, three months after she moved into the Barbour House, Marie
Van Gelder attended the 11:00 mass at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. She was seated in a pew about half-way toward
the front and just as Rev. T. Lester Graham started to preach, she
collapsed. Ushers carried the women to
the vestibule where she died 10 minutes later of a heart attack.
In July 1943 the Brick Presbyterian Church sold Barbour
House to Benjamin Winter. In reporting
the sale The New York Times noted that the building “provides living quarters
for working women of modest income. It
contains 100 rooms and will continue under its present management.”
The new owner made one major change. As noted in Brick Church History it now “extended
its privileges to young men also.” The
book admitted however “It still renders a most important service in providing a
home-like atmosphere for young people whom study or business has brought to the
city.”
Changes in society more than neighborhood eliminated the
need for hotels like the Barbour House.
Surrounded by Garment Center factory buildings on a still-gritty street,
Barbour House became the Barbour Hotel when it was taken over by Praxis Housing
Initiatives in the late 20th century. Under contract with the
city’s Division of AIDS Services and Income Support, the “transitional housing
facility” serves people with HIV/AIDS.
According to its website, the hotel “provides services on site,
including harm reduction, counseling, and programs for substance abusers and
the mentally ill.”
In 2015 plans to demolish Christ Church and its parish house
were announced. When the high-rise hotel
is completed on the site, The Barbour house will be the lone survivor of the
charming Gothic Revival complex.
photographs by the author
photographs by the author
Noooooo! Why demolish such a gorgeous historic building?!? Such a shame.
ReplyDeleteDruggies and low life's occupy it now.crackheads smoke in the rooms, JE
ReplyDeleteTrue story
Delete