Only one Fifth Avenue mansion (far right) still survived as a private house when Mrs. Osborn Company remodeled No. 361 -- photo collection of the Museum of the City of New York |
In 1893 she married Robert Arthur Osborn, a successful wine
merchant and stock broker. The Times
noted that “as his wife she became one of the most popular young matrons in the
fashionable set.” Two children were born
and Josefa Neilson Osborn would most likely have gone about her glittering
schedule of dinner parties, teas and balls had it not been for the Financial
Panic that began in 1893 and lasted through 1897. Robert Osborn was financially ruined. The New York Dramatic Mirror on January 29,
1898 tactfully worded the situation “Mrs. Osborn’s husband recently met with
reverses.”
Rather than wringing her hands, Josefa Osborn set out to make
money. The Mirror reported that “Having
brilliant talents, she set about adding to her income. Within two weeks after Mr. Osborn’s failure
his wife was in possession of excellent revenues as a writer for the
Illustrated American, the Herald, and other papers.” Josefa was widely regarded as one of the most
stylishly dressed women in Manhattan society “for the reason that she possesses
rare taste and skills in designing,” said the Mirror.
Socialites had routinely sought her advice on fashion and so
now she turned her expertise into income by writing fashion columns. She would be a regular writer for The
Delineator, a popular woman’s magazine.
Whether as a result of her columns, or because she aggressively sought
out commissions is unclear, but that year she designed her first theatrical
costumes.
She later told a reporter from The Theatre, “Clothes were
always my passion. I do not mean clothes
merely as clothes, but artistic clothes made to suit the individual
wearer. I used to advise my friends
about their gowns. When a time came…when
I found myself obliged to earn money, I began to advise professionally. I designed the gowns worn by Miss Julie Opp
in ‘The Tree of Knowledge.’ That
achievement was my start.”
By January 1898 she was on the way. “She intends to take commissions to design
all the costumes for the productions of modern plays, believing that she will
be able to effect artistic and ‘swell’ results in studying individual and
ensemble requirements,” said The New York Dramatic Mirror. “If Mrs. Osborn succeeds in supplanting the
crude, inharmonious and flashy costumes now common on the stage of certain of
our theatres whose managers show their blissful ignorance of good form, she
will be doing good missionary work.”
But she had other ideas, too. The wealthiest women of Fifth Avenue had
always come to Josefa Neilson Osborn for fashion advice. She saw no reason why she should not design for them as well. “I think
there is a field for this new work,” she told The Mirror, “and I mean to give
it a thorough trial. I shall not confine
my designing to the stage, as many of my friends in private life are desirous
to have my inventions, too.”
The New York Times reported that “she startled her fashionable
friends by announcing that she intended launching forth into the dressmaking
business for herself.” Whether other
society ladies felt that going into business was simply not something a refined
woman should do, Josefa Neilson Osborn needed money and it was no longer coming from her
husband.
The gargantuan Waldorf-Astoria Hotel had by now had replaced
the brownstone mansions of the Astor Family on the west side of Fifth Avenue
between 33rd and 34th Streets. The surrounding residences were quickly
being converted to businesses as Manhattan’s millionaires fled northward away
from encroaching commerce. Josefa Osborn
took a full partner, Julia Ward, and remodeled a mansion directly across from
the exclusive hotel for her high-end dressmaking business, “Mrs. Osborn
Company." Expanses of multi-paned
windows, topped by broad fanlights, replaced the brownstone façade at the first
and second stories. Painted white, they
gave a light and airy feel to the formerly dour residence. The renovation smacked of the newly-popular “Colonial”
trend.
Mrs. Osborn as a “modiste” was an instant success. She not only dressed the foremost actresses
of the day, like Ethel Barrymore, but socialites with names like Astor and
Belmont. The New York Times would later
say “She immediately became successful, and her gowns were regarded as the most
beautiful creations made in this country.”
She continued her writing, as well, and The Pittsburgh Press
said she “is the greatest individual fashion authority in this country.”
The lucrative business was based on the high-quality
workmanship and the stunning designs.
Josefa Osborn did not rely on Paris couture for her inspiration; she was
a true designer. It was Osborn who first
created the shirtwaist—the single piece of apparel that best defined an entire
generation of turn-of-the-century women.
Mrs. Osborn Company’s success is reflected in the salary it paid to
John E. Sullivan, a fitter and tailor hired on November 24, 1902 for $65 a
week; over $1,000 by today’s standards.
The above Mrs. Osborn Company gown, on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, was possibly worn by Caroline Astor -- metmuseum.org |
That was the same year that Josefa Osborn got another idea,
saying she needed “some recreation.” She
would open a theatre aimed at a wealthy audience (although she denied to the
press that was her scheme). “Rumors have
it circulated that Mrs. Osborn intends her playhouse for the fashionable set
only,” reported Theatre Magazine in October 1902, “These rumors Mrs. Osborn
denies.”
Josefa Neilson Osborn works in her office at Mrs. Osborn's Theatre -- photo from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York |
“I am going to attempt to provide light and agreeable
entertainment for the better class of theatergoers,” she said. “The prices, except for subscribers’ nights,
will be the same as at other first-rate playhouses. The curtain will rise at nine o’clock—not because
nine is a more fashionable hour than eight, but because few New Yorkers can get
to the theatre in comfort before that time.”
The magazine anticipated trouble. “It is a unique enterprise; consequently it
will be called upon to bear the full blunt of criticism that originality
invariably provokes.” The magazine was
right.
With financial backing from Norma L. Munro, daughter of
wealthy publisher George Munro, she leased the old Berkeley Lyceum and renamed
it Mrs. Osborn’s Playhouse. The
auditorium and lobby were completed renovated, including enlarging the stage,
installing a new “electric light plant,” additional seating and boxes.
Among the cast of the opening play, a musical comedy by
Rupert Hughes called “Tommy-rot,” was Evelyn Nesbit. The married actress would achieve immortality
through her affair with architect Stanford White that ended with his murder in
Madison Square Garden. Nesbit later
remembered that “The rehearsals turned out to be little more than exaggerated
tea parties, with Miss Munro and her friends sitting about eating marrons
glaces and sipping highballs while the company tried to get things going
smoothly.”
Perhaps Josefa should have dropped in on the
rehearsals. The play opened in October
and the critics were quick to publish scathing reviews. Munsey’s Magazine said “Mrs. Robert Osborn,
dressmaker, has discovered that it takes more than ushers bearing silver
salvers, together with a charge of two dollars and a half for seats, to make a
playhouse the haunt of the fashionables.”
The critic charged “There were germs of a good idea in it, but from
start to finish there was constant effort to drag the thing down to a lower
level—supposed to be caviar to the society set.”
Life magazine was crueler.
“Mrs. Robert Osborn is a charming, modish and shrewd lady whose business
ventures, which have made her a public character, rest upon her knowledge of that
alleged smart set which Marse Henry Watterson has so vigorously described…Mrs.
Osborn’s experiment is important only as showing that she and her experienced
advisers consider the smart set a pretty brainless lot. Every one else has known it for some time.”
Mrs. Osborn’s Theatre did not last long. Philharmonic magazine smugly reported “Mrs.
Osborn paid big salaries and a stiff rent.
Her expenses are said to have been over $3,000 a week…Miss Munroe could
afford one experiment of this sort, for she has enough money for that, but one
must be many times a millionaire, and that Miss Munroe is not one to see $3,000
a week slipping out of one’s hands for many weeks at a time.”
Despite the failure of the theater, Josefa Osborn was doing
just fine. She lived in a refined
mansion on Rutherford Place and maintained a summer estate in Bellport Village,
Long Island with a guest cottage, “The
Flower Box,” larger than most homes. By
1904 she apparently had decided there was no need for a husband and on October 18
a New York Times headline read “Mrs. Osborn Wants Divorce.”
Josefa’s friendship with Norma Munro soured to the point
that in February 1906 there were back-and-forth lawsuits. Munro had invested about $15,000 into the
playhouse; although Josefa “stepped in and gave $10,000 to settle the debts
out of her own pocket and the goodness of her heart,” said The Sun.
Munro sent a deputy sheriff to the Osborn home. He seized jewelry which she claimed was her
property. Josefa sued, saying the
articles were gifts and that Munro owed her $10,000 in apparel. Things got uglier when The Sun intimated that
it was all a matter of lesbian jealousy.
The newspaper said “Miss Munro became very friendly with
Mrs. Leslie Carter and correspondingly cool to Mrs. Osborn…This fall Miss Munro
appeared daily in Fifth avenue in the black and yellow motor of Mrs. Leslie
Carter. The actress occupied the
apartment of Miss Munro until her road tour began, Miss Munro remaining at her
country place. When Mrs. Carter started
on her travels she was accompanied by Miss Munro, who went with her from city
to city…It seems that the great friendship of Miss Munro and Mrs. Osborn could
not stand this strain.”
While the turmoil was going on the entire block where
Mrs. Osborn Company’s shop sat was razed for the new white marble retail palace
of B. Altman & Co. Mrs. Osborn Company
relocated to Nos. 24-26 East 46th Street where the familiar multi-paned
windows and fan lights were recreated on a smaller scale.
In the meantime, Mrs. Osborn Company continued to design for
and clothe New York’s wealthiest women.
On March 31, 1908 The Evening World published a list of the gowns and
accessories Mrs. Howard Gould purchased from the shop in a period of nine
months. Her husband was annoyed at the
bill, totaling $20,750, since the couple was living apart at the time.
Josefa, the girl who had grown up in a dizzying circle of
dances and dinners now “rarely participated in fashionable functions,” said The
New York Times. Still well-known in
society, she preferred to use her connections to make money rather than to indulge in parties and
fetes.
Later that year, in October, Josefa was busy at work, “directing
her many seamstresses and tailors who were completing the many gowns and wraps
ordered for Horse Show week,” said The New York Times. “There she was taken suddenly ill, and, upon
being removed to her home, Drs. Nagle and Lillienthal decided that an operation
for appendicitis was necessary.”
The operation seemed successful and the doctors assumed she
would be fully recovered within a matter of weeks. When that did not happen, she was operated
upon again. “Mrs. Osborn sank steadily
from this operation until the end,” reported The Times.
Josefa Neilson Osborn died in her house at No. 2 Rutherford
Place on the afternoon of Wednesday, November 11, 1908. With
her passing New York lost a remarkable woman—one who was unafraid to turn her
back on accepted female proprieties in order to survive.
On the block where Mrs. Osborn Company's converted brownstone stood the magnificent white marble B. Altman department store rose. (photo by the author) |
As a born and bred New Yorker, I am rarely stumped by local geography- but you got me on this one: Rutherford Place. A google search identified where it is. I think a visit might be in order. Have you come across any photos of Mrs. Osborn's house there? I assume that it is long gone
ReplyDeleteRutherford Place is just north of Stuyvesant Square Park. And the house is still there, although altered.
DeleteFascintaing story and remarkable for its time.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely a fascinating story. Absolutely love it!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the wonderful story. One of the characters in my new novel is a seamstress, and your article provides helpful research.
ReplyDeleteP.S. I lived at Stuyvesant Town for many years and my favorite job of all was working as a "Saturday Extra" at B. Altman & Company during my high school and college years in the late 50s and early 60s.
ReplyDeleteSuch a lovely gown! Interesting story, thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteMrs. Osborn was grandmother to my stepfather, Osborn Elliott, editor-in-chief of Newsweek magazine during its glory years and later dean of the Columbia School of Journalism. Thanks for a fascinating article.
ReplyDeleteI found your fascinating article when researching an actress ancestor Madlyn Summers whose biography mentions her'being engaged by Mrs. Robert Osborn to appear as one of the six little dancing girls in Tommy Rot which had quite a successful run at Mrs. Osborn's playhouse. I was so pleased to see the photo of the cast which you included. Janet Summers, UK.
ReplyDelete