photo by Alice Lum |
When he died in London on September 22, 1909, his library
included nearly 21,000 titles including a first edition of the “Works” of Ben
Jonson printed in 1616 and of the “Comedies and Tragedies of Francis Beaumont”
dated 1647. The auction of his library,
valued at approximately $1 million at the time, lasted four days with two
sessions per day.
Hoe’s 50-foot wide mansion now stood empty on a block filled
with equally handsome homes, just east of Fifth Avenue. While the 36th Street block was
still entirely residential, Fifth Avenue was changing. Just steps away from the Hoe mansion Tiffany
& Company’s white marble piazza had been built in 1905, as had the immense B.
Altman Department store a block to the south.
With Robert Hoe’s property available, change would come to 36th
Street as well.
The “crockery and glassware” district had been centered
around Barclay Street, far downtown, for over half a century. But with the high-end retailers moving
further up Fifth Avenue, the china and crystal dealers took notice. In April 1912 Bawo & Dotter, one of the
country’s largest dealers, announced it would abandon its Barclay Street headquarters—where
it had been since 1864—to move to West 33rd Street. The
New York Times noted that is was an indication of “the uptown movement, which
has so widely developed in other trades during the past year.”
Simultaneously, Haviland & Co. made an even more
shocking announcement. Not only was the
respected firm moving from 45 Barclay Street, it would open a retail store for
its imported china. No other wholesale
china or glassware dealer had attempted to deal directly with the consumer.
Haviland had purchased Robert Hoe’s mansion as well as the
abutting property on 37th Street—enabling a shipping and receiving
entrance to the back. By the end of May
1912 the new Haviland Building was ready for occupancy. The
stoic brown Tuscan-style structure was, perhaps, surprising. Unlike the airy white marble Italian palaces
built for Altman and Tiffany, the Haviland Building was almost industrial. By no means did it reflect the delicate
French wares that were displayed inside the four-floors of Haviland showrooms.
The Haviland Building, in 1912, noticeably interrupted the block of refined mansions -- photo Library of Congress |
Yet the completed building of terra cotta, brownstone and mixed
reddish-brown and buff brick was a delightful romance. The first three floors of showrooms were
regimented and balanced, the second floor being flooded with daylight through
an expansive wall of glass. Above the third floor cornice the structure
broke into two, asymmetrical towers that shot upwards with arched windows, terra
cotta panels and brownstone trim. It
all culminated in a quixotic Tuscan bell tower atop the taller east tower and a
handsome arcade on the other.
photo by Alice Lum |
The new Haviland Building advertised space in the upper
eight “de luxe” floors “in this centre of New York’s most aristocratic
commerce.” An advertisement in The New
York Sun on May 31, 1912 illustrated what it called “the high character of the
surroundings” with a four-block map. Along
with Tiffany & Co. and B. Altman were shown the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, the
Vanderbilt Hotel, Gorham & Co., Maillard’s, and the residence and library
of J. P. Morgan at the end of the block on Madison Avenue.
Although Haviland & Co. catered to the carriage trade,
the carriage trade did not necessarily appreciate having the commercial
building dropped squarely in the middle of its sedate block. Quickly after the construction of the
Haviland Building the homes along East 36th Street were abandoned
for commercial use.
Light colored bricks are sprinkled among the ruddy brown bricks -- photo by Alice Lum |
A mix of tenants filled the building above Haviland’s four
floors of showrooms where well-dressed Edwardian ladies shopped for pricey
French china. Among these was E. Virgel
Neal who took the entire ninth floor for his executive offices on September
1917. The Sun noted that Neal was “of
Paris” and “has extensive interests in the United States and Canada.” Readers of the newspaper who wondered about
the “extensive interests” would soon find out.
Neal used the office to market Nuxated Iron, his bottled
medicine that was guaranteed to make men “feel as full of life and energy as a
boy of 21” and to “increase vigor, snap and staying power. It enriches the blood, brings roses to the
cheeks of women, and is an unfailing source of renewed vitality, endurance and power
to men.”
Unfortunately for E. Virgel Neal, the New-York Tribune was a
pioneer in investigative journalism; actually having a department titled the
Tribune Bureau of Investigations. The newspaper explained to readers that “To
appreciate the pulling power of a booze-supported medicine it is necessary to
analyze the medicine. To understand the
pulling force of a testimonial-propped nostrum, it is necessary to analyze the
testimonials.” And the Tribune did just
that with Neal’s Nuxated Iron. It came
to the conclusion that “They have dressed up the wrong lot of dummies.”
Within three months of Neal’s opening his office, the
Tribune published an article with the headline “False Advertising Chief ‘Stimulant’
In Nuxated Iron.” Not only did the newspaper’s chemical analysis
of the medicine reveal that it was mostly alcohol, its background investigation
of Neal was even more eye-opening.
The Tribune brutally exposed him as “alias X. La Motte Sage,
whose meteoric career at ‘The New York Institute of has included ‘exhibitions’ of
hypnotism and ‘teaching’ of palmistry, a partner in Physicians and Surgeons,
put out of business by a government fraud-order; the chief operator of the
notorious Force of Life Company, killed by exposure in the newspapers and
interested in various other medical enterprises.” The article said of the patent medicine “Ostensibly,
it is manufactured by the Dae Health Laboratories, of Detroit, but the actual
and principal output—the advertising and general fakery—is from Neal’s offices
in the Haviland Building.”
E. Virgel Neal, whom the newspaper called one “of the slickest
quacks in all patent medicinedom,” fought back.
In June he filed suit in the Supreme Court for libel. The New-York Tribune used the suit to fire
another volley. It used the filing as a
reason to reiterate its claims. “The
article sued on said the use of alcohol as the chief stimulant in the patent
medicine trade had been succeeded in the case of Nuxated Iron by cunningly persuasive
forms of advertising with unfounded claims and faked endorsements as the
principal ingredients.”
The newspaper ended its latest article with a near-threat to
Neal. “Suits for millions of dollars
have been brought upon articles in The Tribune, exposing fakery in
advertising. Few plaintiffs have dared
to come to trial and those who have soon found the courts and juries are
determined to uphold The Tribune in its campaign. All efforts to muzzle The Tribune by
commencement of libel suits have failed.”
photo by Alice Lum |
Other tenants were not so colorful. In 1918 Commissioner James S. Harlan of the
Interstate Commerce Commission opened his offices in the building. The commissioner faced a mounting problem
with shipping and receiving of freight in a city rapidly outgrowing its
railroad and trucking infrastructure.
Manufacturers like Scherer Mfg. and the Burroughs Adding
Machine Company were in the building by the early 1920s, while Haviland &
Co. continued to grow. On February 28,
1922 The New York Times noted that the firm purchased the dwelling at 9 East
Thirty-sixth Street” from Mrs. S. A. Robbins.
“Some time ago the firm acquired the property at 13 and 15 East Thirty-sixth
Street, adjoining, so that they now control a frontage of 131 feet on
Thirty-sixty Street.”
In 1933, however, Haviland moved out and the showroom floors
became home to the Lightolier Company, dealers in electric light fixtures. Lighting Magazine announced that the company “after
more than 20 years of its 30 years existence at 569-575 Broadway, will move to
new quarters at 11 East 36th Street. The three floors which
Lightolier Company will occupy are in the structure formerly known as the
Haviland Building and now to be renamed 'Lightolier Building.'"
The Lightolier directors may have thought the new name would
stick, but it did not. To New Yorkers
No. 11 East 36th Street remained the Haviland Building. Five years later when Valentine & Co.,
leased 10,000 square feet in the building The Times still referred to it as the
Haviland Building. Valentine & Co.
was the paint and varnish manufacturer whose most recognized brand name was
Valspar. With the signing of the lease
the building became headquarters for the Valspar Corporation, Detroit Graphic
Company, Con-Ferro Paint and Varnish Company and the Valspar Corporation,
Ltd., of Canada.
For years little changed for No. 11 East 36th
Street. Lightolier remained in the
showrooms for decades and various tenants like the Art Book Guild of America
came and went. Then as the 21st
century dawned the building became home to The Renfrew Center of New York City,
the nation’s first residential eating disorder facility. The center was established to assist women
suffering from anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and
other behavioral health issues.
Almost a century after the Haviland Building opened its
doors, it finally lost its name. In 2009
the building was converted to luxury condominiums and renamed The Morgan—with deference
to the nearby J. P. Morgan house and library.
Interior designer Andres Escobar transformed the former offices and loft
spaces into high-end residences; no more than six to a floor.
Although the building’s developers inexplicably ignored its
history in renaming it, they carefully preserved the handsome Tuscan façade. As it did in 1912, the unusual architecture stands
alone; both quirky and wonderful.
Do you know if the bell tower and arcade had any use other than as purely decorative elements? And when the building was recomissioned for residential occupancy, were they put to use?
ReplyDeleteBell tower encloses the water tank for the building. The article makes no mention of when the building lost all of the fine balconies and protruding brownstone details. Those elements brought much needed depth and visual relief between the various floor levels and variety of window fenestrations. The impact of the facade is much diminished today as it looks disorganized without the balconies to separate the different facade treatments.
ReplyDeleteThe windows on the upper floors preserve the façade?
ReplyDelete