In 1881 the building at No. 142 West 29th Street
was described as a “three-story brick store and tenement.” In the lot behind it was another, smaller
structure that may have been used for storage, a stable, or a rented
house. Sitting squarely within the Tenderloin
District, it was surrounded by crime, vice and police corruption.
In 1895 Arnold Grob leased the building from the estate of
John G. Cary. He converted the ground
floor "store" into one more of the dozens of saloons in the district. He would run his saloon and billiard hall here
for 15 years.
Most likely as added protection in the gritty neighborhood,
Grob kept a large mastiff chained in the rear yard. On the night of September 3, 1900 Henry Lyman
walked into the saloon. After having a few drinks, he stepped out into
the back yard to pester the muscular dog which he knew was safely chained.
The following day The New York
Times reported “Lyman teased the dog, and finally poked him with a billiard
cue. The animal resented these familiarities,
and with a ferocious growl jumped at Lyman.
The force of his jump broke the chain, and in a second the dog was
burying his teeth in Lyman’s face.”
The drunk and the dog rolled over
and over as Lyman tried unsuccessfully to escape from the infuriated beast. The man’s screams were finally heard inside
as “the dog was getting the better of Lyman.”
Arnold Grob came to the rescue, pulling the dog off the wounded man.
Lyman’s face was “terribly
lacerated” and he was severely bitten over his body. He was in the New York Hospital the following
day “in a dangerous condition.”
A major reform of the Police
Department, due in no small part to the efforts of Commissioner Theodore
Roosevelt, put an end to the notorious Tenderloin District around this same
time. In 1905 the brick building at No.
142 West 29th Street was demolished and in its place a three-story
commercial building was constructed.
The district was not the only
thing changing in 1905. A revolution
among artists and architects against overblown Victorian ornamentation was seen
in the related Arts and Crafts and Craftsman styles; and further west in the
emerging Prairie School and Chicago styles.
Henry I. Oser designed No. 142 West 29th Street for the Furrier's Building Company. He used energetic cast iron spandrel panels to define the little loft building—their geometric cobweb-like motif at the cutting edge of architectural style. Above the third floor they formed a serrated parapet with spiky finials. The completed structure was small. It sat on an out-of-the-way block. But its style, modified for a small urban structure, shouted that it was both unusual and important.
Henry I. Oser designed No. 142 West 29th Street for the Furrier's Building Company. He used energetic cast iron spandrel panels to define the little loft building—their geometric cobweb-like motif at the cutting edge of architectural style. Above the third floor they formed a serrated parapet with spiky finials. The completed structure was small. It sat on an out-of-the-way block. But its style, modified for a small urban structure, shouted that it was both unusual and important.
The crisp angularity of the central panels contrast with the smooth bobbins. |
The former neighborhood of
gambling dens, dives and brothels was already being consumed by the Furrier
District as well as a few other apparel firms.
In 1917 the Hirschfeld Cloak Co. took a floor. And in 1920 the building was home to the
Gabbe Mole Works offices (their “dressing plant” was in Norwalk, Connecticut);
Chernak Bros. & Ratner; and Katzman & Henig, all fur dealers.
Throughout the 20th century
No. 129 would house dealers in “furs and skins.” In 1922 I. Berg & Sons was in the
building, as was William Levy, who would remain at least through 1933. As the century drew to a close, furriers
still leased upper spaces; while in 1981 the retail store had become home to
the Biarritz Thrift Shop. By now the
little building was hemmed in by soaring factory structures and the original
store front was heavily altered. But
above, the wonderful 1905 façade remained intact.
The rare, if bedraggled, gem was
put on the market and then sold in 2015.
In its sales pitch, the exclusive agent ignored the architectural rarity
of the structure, focusing only on the lot’s potential for development.
And indeed, in May 2015, the new
owner, New Jersey-based Hasso Gulrajaney, filed for permits to build a 15-story,
30,000 square-foot luxury residential building on the site. The development would require approval from
the Board of Standards and Appeals. But
for the time being, it appears another overlooked treasure is about to be lost.
photographs by the author
" filed for permits to build a 15-story, 30,000 square-foot luxury residential building on the site. " - because we don't have enough of those right now
ReplyDeleteAt the very least a developer with any brain would see that incorporating that facade at the base of their luxury high rise would provide an instant wow factor that would separate it from the hundreds of anonymous blank glass facades being erected everywhere these days. To bad we have no developers with brains these days. Hasso Gulrajaney is no different. NY
ReplyDeleteThis is exactly what I was thinking but I'm sure the developer will go as cheap as possible.
DeleteI attended the community board meeting during which the design review committee voted against this. The facade was discussed but owners made no comment.
ReplyDeleteHi the correct address is 142 if it can be updated here. The panels were removed and I am in the process of documenting them with the permission of the owner. I would love to save one if someone knows a place that would want it...they weigh over 200 lbs I am told. I will see them today I hope. Lynne Funk. LFunk@LFAA.nyc
ReplyDeleteThanks for catching that glaring typo in the title. Hard to believe that it took six years for someone to spot! thanks again.
DeleteIf the base building dates to 1905, what date is the cast iron detail? There was an alteration in the 20s I see in DOB records....could this spiky design predate that?
ReplyDeleteThere were several alterations over the years; but the cast panels are original to Oser's design. Late architectural history Christopher Gray confirmed when this post was published.
DeleteTom, I would love to see a timeline of Oser works that established this. Although I see a resemblance to Sullivan's interlocking patterns from around 1905, is there proof that the current 142 W 29 facade went in then, not in 1928 or 1929 when there were alterations? I see Oser's other designs are from that era, I cant find out more about him from Goggle, like how long ihe kept his practice. Lynne Funk
ReplyDeleteOther than the fact that the style is consistent with the 1905 period and not the 1920's, I do not know what to tell you.
Delete