photo by Alice Lum |
Architect Charles T. Mott was a busy man in the 1880s and ‘90s as the Upper West Side saw a frenzy of development. Mott was among the most prolific of the architects working in the area as speculative builders threw up full blocks of rowhouses In 1888 alone one such builder, William & Merrit & Co., advertised 38 new houses designed by Mott in the West End Avenue and 73rd Street neighborhood.
In 1891 he designed five upscale townhouses for developers
William Jacob and Reuben Skinner on West 76th Street—Nos. 323
through 331. Mott, like most of the
architects working on the West Side at the time, dipped freely into the grab bag
of historic styles. His designs for
these five homes were a Victorian take on the Renaissance. They were designed in a symmetrical A-B-C-B-A
pattern, with the end houses matching one another; Nos. 325 and 329 matching;
and the center home, No. 327, standing out on its own right down to the brick
color.
The houses were completed in 1892. Like its neighbors, No. 325 rose four stories
above an English basement. While using only
sparse ornamentation, Mott created a romantic, attractive façade. He provided a visually-sturdy base by using
brownstone for the basement and parlor levels—rough-cut stone for the basement
where the entrance was accessed below the stoop; and smooth planed
stone for the floor above. The eye was
drawn upward by the lighter color of the Roman brick used on the upper three
stories. Here a two-story oriel provided
the focal point with a delightful arcaded porch; its brick columns capped by
Medieval-style carved capitals. Mott’s
minimal decoration at this level included the creative use of chevron-patterned
brick to outline the openings and trace the edges of the structure. Above it all, a line of lions’ heads stared
down from the brackets of the pressed metal cornice.
Lions gaze down from the end of each cornice bracket. Mott's creative brickwork is reflected in the intricate knot. photo by Alice Lum |
On October 7, 1892, shortly after the home’s completion, it
was sold to Helen D. Burnett. She was
relatively active in New York real estate and it is unclear whether she
actually lived in the home.
Certainly by the turn of the century No. 325 was being leased to Edward
D. Jones, secretary of the J. Hood Wright Memorial Hospital on 131st
Street and Amsterdam Avenue. He was
most likey the same Edward D. Jones who partnered with Charles Dow and
Charles Bergstresser in 1882 to form Dow Jones & Company.
On September 20, 1902 the Real Estate Record & Builders’
Guide reported that Helen D. Burnett had sold the house to William H. Parsons, Jr. and his wife, Laura. The couple took out a mortgage of $26,000 on the property. The mortgage would amount to about $680,000
today.
It was customary for the title of residential
property to be put in the name of one's wife; and Laura W. Parsons was reported as the purchaser. Parsons's father was head of
paper manufacturers W. H. Parsons & Co. at No. 66 Broadway.
photo by Alice Lum |
Shipman and his brother, James, were stationers at No. 10
Murray Street. Sixteen years earlier
they were tasked with the uncomfortable job of having their wealthy father
declared insane. Wealthy and retired in
1888, Asa L. Shipman had been in the bookbinding business. For years he lived at Ocean Grove, New Jersey
in the summer and wintered in Florida.
In June 1887 he fell and struck the back of his head. Family members noticed that his mind
deteriorated after that. James and
Edward found themselves in court on July 24, 1888 where their father was unable
to understand simple questions. The New
York Times reported the following day that a sheriff’s jury found him
insane. “Mr. Shipman is 74 years old,
and quite imbecile,” it said.
Now, Edward Shipman’s family moved into the 19-room house,
just months before a crime spree hit the neighborhood. The New-York Tribune said that the “long
series of bold hold-ups and burglaries” had “caused terror” and the newspaper belittled the
police force. “Conditions in this
neighborhood as regards protection of property, or, rather, the lack of
protection, have aroused the indignation of all the residents. Some of the patrolmen on the upper West Side
have posts ten blocks long, and while they are patrolling one end of them the
thieves are industrious at the other.”
photo by Alice Lum |
Within the month police had arrested Owen Smith and charged
him not only with the Shipman burglary; but with the armed robbery of brewer
Ernest G. W. Woers; of S. Barclay Latimer; and of Dr. Talbot of West 68th
Street. In the latter case, Smith
reportedly held Dr. Talbot’s son and a servant, Lena Johnson at gunpoint. All of the victims “identified Smith as the
footpad,” said The Evening World.
Unfortunately when the group entered the courtroom on
January 24, 1905, each one identified Henry Smith, the accused’s look-alike brother as the
robber. “When they found out that they
were in error, they all refused to make a complaint against the prisoner,”
reported The Evening World that afternoon.
“This aroused Magistrate Ommen, who declared that something
ought to be done to rid the city of thugs who have recently terrorized the
upper west side. No one would take the
initiative.”
Detectives went undercover and haunted pool rooms and bars
to get evidence against Smith. Finally one
man, a former schoolmate of Smith’s, talked.
“Collins said he heard Smyth [sic] call up a maid in the Shipman house
and tell her that he was the man who had robbed the place; that he was sorry,
but, needing the money, he had to do it.”
On Saturday, February 4 Smith was back behind bars.
Things in the neighborhood returned to normal and Edward L.
Shipman and his wife, the former Mary Smyth, lived on here for years. Mary died in the house on December 7, 1923.
Approximately 20 layers of paint were carefully removed from the Renaissance Revival-carved oak mantel. |
Today the exterior of Charles T. Mott’s neo-Renaissance fantasy is barely changed after nearly 125 years. And thanks to the loving and sympathetic attention of the Nelsons the formerly brutalized interiors have been brought resuscitated.
This must have been a very comfortable house to live in – and fun, with its quirky balcony. Are the windows original and typical of the period in New York?
ReplyDeleteThose are replacement windows. The originals would have had several panes.
DeleteI lived here during the nineties in one of the top floor apartments and had my first child at the nearby Roosevelt Hospital. The landlord at that time was a Mr Ward - a very interesting man who had worked in publishing before retiring.
Delete