photo by Alice Lum |
By the time of his wedding a decade later he had bought out
the partnership which now had 1,000 employees and controlled 80
percent of Pennsylvania’s coal. While Frick
and his new bride, Adelaide, honeymooned in New York City in 1881 he became
acquainted with Andrew Carnegie. The
meeting resulted in a partnership between H. C. Frick & Company and the
Carnegie Steel Company—later to become United States Steel.
But Frick’s name would soon become synonymous in the minds
of American workers with greed and cold-hearted disregard for the
lower class. He helped organize the
South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club in the 1880s, an elite group of
millionaires with a private lodge on Lake Conemaugh high above Johnstown,
Pennsylvania. The equally-private lake
was the result of the earthen South Fork Dam which was shoddily repaired with
little or no concern for safety or stability.
On May 31, 1889, following heavy snowmelt and rain, the dam
gave out releasing 20 million tons of water onto the town of Johnstown. 2,209 people were killed.
A year later workers struck Carnegie Steel’s Homestead
Works. Ardently anti-union, Frick
ordered the construction of a solid fence protected by barbed wire. When striking workers encircled what they
termed “Fort Frick,” the tycoon ordered 300 Pinkerton detectives to descent on
them with Winchester rifles. Nine
workers were killed in the melee that followed.
As a direct result, Frick was the victim of an assassination
attempt on July 23, 1892. He survived,
but his reputation did not. He is often
remembered as the most hated man in America at the time.
By 1905, despite the personal and professional friction
between him and Carnegie, Henry Frick was spending more and more time in New
York City. He signed a ten-year lease on
the George W. Vanderbilt house on Fifth Avenue and 51st Street, then
“spent thousands of dollars in alterations, eliminating the garden in front and
adding a massive entrance,” according to The New York Times later. The newspaper estimated his rent at $100,000
“making this Vanderbilt house the most costly private residence under lease in
the city.”
At the time, Carrere & Hastings’ masterful white marble
New York Public Library was rising ten blocks to the south. The magnificent building would make obsolete the
Lenox Library further uptown at 71st Street. As Frick’s lease neared its expiration, the
fate of the beautiful Lenox Library was evident—the building would be
demolished and the land sold.
The magnificent Lenox Library would be razed in 1912 and on its site Henry Frick would raise his equally-magnificent home. photograph by H. N. Tiemann & Co. from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWEFQFQF&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915 |
In 1907 Frick bought the entire block front on Fifth Avenue
from 70th Street to 71st Street for his permanent New
York residence; spending $2 million on the land alone. But he would have to wait until the library
building was gone. Finally, on May 26, 1912
The New York Times reported that “Henry C. Frick is to build his new Fifth
Avenue residence where the old Lenox Library now stands, between Seventieth and
Seventy-first Streets, and work on it will be begun in a few weeks.” Frick had chosen the architects of the new
Public Library for his palace.
Although Frick generously offered to pay for the dismantling
and reconstruction of the Lenox Library in Central Park, the city ultimately
decided against it. “Housewreckers will
begin within the next two or three weeks to tear down the heavy, dignified
building given by James Lenox to the city in 1870,” said The Times.
Employees at Carrere & Hastings were closed-mouthed
about the cost of the proposed Frick house. “None of the members
would even hazard a guess as to what the new house will cost, but it is
probably quite safe to say that it will total $3,000,000,” opined the
newspaper.
The Times also held out no great initial expectations. “There will be nothing spectacular in its
exterior appearance,” it said.
Another Times journalist apparently had more
information. On the same day a separate
article noted “Plans are being prepared by the architects, Carrer &
Hastings, for the new residence, which in all probability will be one of the
finest private residences on the avenue.”
Indeed there were only two larger parcels of private
home real estate in the city—those of Andrew Carnegie and Charles M. Schwab. But Frick's art gallery would be, perhaps,
unsurpassed. The New York Times told its
readers “The picture gallery will be the chief feature. It will be one of the largest in the
city. Mr. Frick is taking more pride in
the arrangement of the gallery than in any other part of his new mansion. It will contain some of the most valuable and
famous paintings in the world, including not only works of enormous intrinsic
value, but famous paintings in the art literature of the world.”
Already Frick had assembled a staggering collection including
a famous 1644 three-quarter length portrait of Philip IV of Spain by Valesquez. Frick paid about $400,000 for that painting
alone—nearly $9 million today. At the
time of the article, he had just returned from Europe, bringing with him
Rembrandt’s “The Merchant,” and a year earlier had added Romney’s portrait of
Lady Milnes, and Gainsborough’s full-length portrait of the Hon. Anne E.
Duncombe.
A month later the estimates of Frick’s city palace had risen
to $4 million, and on January 5, 1913 The Times Dispatch of Richmond, Virginia
reported on the impending construction and placed the cost a “more than $5
million.” That figure would be about $83
million in today’s dollars.
Newspapers repeatedly compared the coming mansion with the
ex-Senator Clark mansion; at the time the most expensive private home in the
city. Reporters could not resist
injecting not-always-subtle insults to that house. Comparing the plans for the Frick house to
the Clark mansion, The Times Dispatch said “The new Frick residence will not be
a gaudy, showy affair. It will be a long
and low structure, simple in details.”
Seen shortly after completion in 1915 from across the avenue, the mansion engulfs the block. The wing at left is the original art gallery. photo by Wurts Bros. from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWEFQ9LZ&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915 |
Indeed, Carrere & Hastings’ plan was not gaudy—although “showy”
could be debated. “With princely
disregard for the value of Fifth avenue real estate, Mr. Frick sets the front
of his mansion seventy-five feet back from the avenue,” remarked the El Paso
Herald on November 16, 1913. “Men who
are wise in New York real estate matters express the opinion that never again
will it be possible to secure a whole block of frontage on Fifth avenue for
private residence purposes. Indeed, the
new Frick mansion is likely to be the last on Manhattan Island to cover
anything like so spacious an area.”
The newspaper called the house “an architectural masterpiece
in the Italian Renaissance style, with interior arrangement and decoration in
keeping.”
Readers across the nation followed the construction. The Times Dispatch reported that “The dining
room will be at the southwest corner of the building, behind the drawing rooms,
and will look out upon a large fountain and sunken gardens. A wide corridor will connect the library and
the drawing rooms.”
An army of workers swarmed over the construction site as the house rose. photo by Wurts Bros. from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWEFQ9LZ&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915 |
The journalist added “One of the features of the sunken
garden, which will be close to Fifth Avenue, shut off from the curious by the
stone garden wall, will be a pool, sixty-feet long and fifteen feet wide. This will be in the centre of the garden and
at its south end will be a large fountain.”
As the mansion neared completion, Frick set off on a
European furniture buying trip. The
Evening World reported on April 10, 1914 “In selecting the furniture he will
have the advice of Miss Elsie de Wolfe.”
The newspaper added, almost parenthetically, a most extraordinary item. “News has come to Mr. Frick’s friends that he
has under consideration a plan to leave this residence at his death to the city
as a museum for the public.”
Manhattan millionaires had a tradition of donating their
extensive art collections to museums—most notably the Metropolitan Museum of
Art. But Henry C. Frick envisioned his
yet-to-be-completed mansion as a permanent monument to his stellar art
collection. It was an unheard of
concept.
Within just the past year or two he had added to the
collection with a Valesquez, a Franz Hals, and Whistler masterpieces including
the portraits of Rosa Corder and Count Robert de Montesquiou from the Richard
A. Canfield collection. Frick paid
$200,000 for the two Whistler portraits alone.
Later The Sun would say “For years he planned to build a
home in New York, and in his trips abroad ransacked Europe for rare old
panellings, bits of carved woodwork and ceilings of great beauty until he had
spent a fortune on the interior decorations.”
Over a century before Frick began construction on his
mansion, famed French artist Frangonard painted a series of architectural panels
for Louis XV’s mistress, Madam du Barry. The panels, begun in 1772, were purchased by
J. P. Morgan in 1902 for $400,000 and installed in his London mansion.
Upon his death, the Fragonards were purchased by the Duveen
Brothers for $1.2 million and shipped to New York City where they were put on
display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Henry Frick admired them so much
that he had the architects change course, designing a Louis Seize room to accommodate
them. Frick paid about $1.5 million for
the 14 panels.
On March 15, 1915 the New-York Tribune somewhat sadly
reported “The public has had its last look at the Fragonard panels which formed
part of the vast art collection of the late J. Pierpont Morgan.
“To-day they will be taken from the Metropolitan Museum of
Art to the galleries in the residence of Henry C. Frick, at Fifth Avenue and
Seventieth Street…The centre of interest for the huge throng of visitors that
flocked to the museum yesterday was the separate room in the walls of which
were set the panels that will hereafter delight the eyes of only Mr. Frick and
his guests.”
A room in the house was especially designed to accommodate the Fragonard panels. photograph http://www.frick.org/visit/virtual_tour/fragonard_room |
That year the house was finally completed and The North
Dakota newspaper the Bismark Daily Tribune joined the host of publications
nationwide in describing it. “A palace such as any oriental potentate would
envy is the $4,000,000 home which has just been completed by Henry Clay Frick,
the coke man of Pittsburg, who is to make his permanent home here.”
That newspaper, too, poked at Senator Clark. “Unlike the Clark residence, which was built
at an expense of between $6,500,000 and $7,000,000, the new Frick home is not a
gaudy, showy affair.”
The house would see
the comings and goings of celebrated politicians and business titans. But perhaps none was more publicized than the
visit of Marshal Joffre and other French dignitaries in May 1917 during World
War I. Newspapers reported on the
thousands of cheering New Yorkers who waved French and American flags as the
motorcade inched from City Hall to the Frick mansion.
Once the guests were in the house, The New York Times
reported that “During the evening Fifth Avenue and Seventieth and Seventy-first
Streets, about the Frick residence, were crowded with the curious, who hung
about in the seeming hope of seeing some of Mr. Frick’s distinguished
guests. Through some of the open windows
the sounds of the organ could be heard for a block or more.”
The vast lawn--highly valuable Manhattan real estate used for grass--spoke of Frick's endless wealth --photo by Alice Lum |
The newspaper said “Inside the house vista after vista of
costliness and splendor met the eyes of the hero of the Marne and helped to
make him forget his rude days of campaigning against the Germans. In the centre is a large living hall, opening
upon an inner garden in the rear of the mansion. On either side of this hall are a fine
library and drawing room. To the
southward is the dining room from which the French guests looked out upon the
great fountain and the sunken garden.
Adjacent is the grand staircase.”
El Greco's "St. Jerome" hangs above the mantel in the warmly-paneled "living hall" in 1927. Photograph http://www.frick.org/visit/virtual_tour/living_hall |
The Times felt that the dignitaries would have much to
admire among “Mr. Frick’s treasures which were spread before the eyes of Marshal
Joffre and the other French guests of honor.
In his art gallery, through which his distinguished visitors could stroll
from the house proper whenever the spirit moved them, are examples of
Rembrandt, Reynolds, Romney, El Greco, Valesquez, Turner, Veronese, Holbein,
Gainsborough, Lawrence, van Dyck, Goya, Whistler and other artists.”
The newspaper dropped an editorial comment on the value of
the paintings. “For many of these Mr.
Frick paid prices that were a nine days’ wonder when they were announced.”
The New York Times opined that the French visitors would find the sunken garden and decorative pool relaxing -- photo by Alice Lum |
With the war’s end 21,000 soldiers arrived in New York City in
March 1919 to receptions and massive celebrations. A Victory Arch, designed by Thomas Hastings,
was erected on Fifth Avenue outside the Public Library. Among the returning soldiers were the wounded
and disabled who were unable to participate in the victory parade. Special
accommodations were arranged for their viewing of the parade. Five hundred seats were provided in front of
the Public Library and the New-York Tribune reported on March 24 that “Shell
shock patients from the Gun Hill Hospital will be seated between Fifty-ninth
and Sixtieth streets, on the camouflaged stand on the west side of the avenue.”
Frick opened his vast Fifth Avenue lawn for the injured soldiers. “Twenty-one hundred severely wounded men from
the Grand Central Palace Hospital will occupy automobile trucks parked at each
intersection between Forty-fifth and Fifty-first streets. Those better able to get about will be accommodated
in the covered stand erected by Henry C. Frick in front of his residence on
Lenox Hill.”
Nine months later the house would be the scene of a much
graver event. At 5:30 on the afternoon
of December 3, 1919 Henry Frick’s funeral was held in the music room. The millionaire capitalist, deemed ruthless
and heartless by some, lived among the art treasures in his splendid Fifth
Avenue palace only four years.
The very day of the funeral The Sun reported “The
announcement yesterday that Mr. Frick’s almost unrivalled art treasures were to
pass to the city came as a surprise to all save a few of his intimate friends.” Of course the donation of the mansion and the
artwork would not come to pass while Adelaide Frick still lived.
“The gift to the city is subject to the life interest of
Mrs. Frick in both the residence and the works of art,” reported The Sun on
December 3. The house and the art
collection were appraised in 1923 at $93 million.
The City of New York would wait for its museum for some
time. Adelaide Frick lived on until October
4, 1931 at the age of 71. During the last two years of her life she was
mostly ill during the seven months a year she lived here (she spent the summer
months at the country estate in Pride’s Crossing, Massachusetts). When in residence here she saw only her
immediate family and intimate friends.
Adelaide’s nephew, Karl F. Overholt, spoke to a reporter
about the house shortly after her death.
“He said that the Frick residence in this city was more of a museum than
a home and that even the few rooms she occupied on the second floor contained
articles in the Frick art collection.”
Architect John Russell Pope was commissioned to renovate the
house into a functional museum. Among
the $1 million alterations would be a new art reference library erected at Nos.
10 and 12 East 71st Street, and a one-story addition to the
mansion. The Times noted “In keeping with the expressed
desire of the trustees to maintain the residential character of the house and
to avoid giving it the atmosphere of a museum, the alterations to the Frick
mansion will be of a minor nature.”
The Reference Library, to the rear, was sympathetically designed to meld with the mansion -- photo by Alice Lum |
Necessary were the addition of a reception room and cloak
room, an enclosed court, entrance gallery and a lecture hall. The museum was opened by invitation on December
11, 1935. Critics remarked favorably at
the residential nature that was preserved in Henry Frick’s home; a highly
unusual concept for anything other than a house museum.
Henry Frick’s magnificent Fifth Avenue mansion would be in
itself a remarkable and important example of residential architecture. The tycoon’s vision of retaining his
collection within its walls created one of New York City’s and the nation’s
most unique and important art collections; doubling the importance of the
structure.
photo by Alice Lum |
Did not know Frick offered to dismantle and reconstruct the beautiful Lenox Library building at his own expense. For a much maligned figure, maybe with some historical justification, that was a very generous offer not to mention his intentions to create a museum in new york with his art collection
ReplyDeleteGreat article Tom.
ReplyDeleteI had the pleasure of being a medical student at Columbia and interacting with Dr. Henry Clay Frick II, his grandson. Dr. Frick was a Professor of Gynecologic Oncology and one of the kindest and most unassuming surgeons I have ever known. According to Columbia lore although he was driven acoss the GW bridge with a chauffer he never acted or dressed in a way which would disclose his status. He supposedly never cashed his meager pay as a resident and many uncashed checks were found in his small and spartan residents' sleeping rooms. He often had on a well worn shirt and was an extremely kind gentleman with a memory of his students. As I understand it, the Frick family retained the right to sleep in the second level rooms as a pied a terre for years after the ground level became a museum which they exercised after attending the theater or opera in the city. I was VERY sorry to learn that he passed away. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B03E6DD173EF936A25751C0A9619C8B63
Peter
Another very fine post - longer with more details and photos to savor. I especially like the detail that Frick offered HIS LAWN for the injured soldiers ! I continue to enjoy your blog so much. Hopefully one day we will see a book printed from it ?? (hint hint )
ReplyDeleteThe story behind Elsie de Wolfe and her working for Frick in acquiring treasures for this house in 1914 is very interesting. Apparently she located him on a golf course and begged him to preview the upcoming dispersal of the contents of a magnificent chateau just outside of Paris. Frick asked her what were the best items in the collection, and she replied "everything". He immedately began buying and in a matter of about 2 hours time he had spent nearly 1 million dollars. Since Miss de Wolfe received a finders fee percentage of the price of every item purchased, she soon realized that she was becoming a very rich woman.
ReplyDeleteFrick supposedly gave her a red enamel Faberge clock she had admired in the collection as a thank you gift.
***
Very sad story regarding all the people who perished in his quest for grandeur. I'm not impressed by his sudden generosity, that was part of his ego to be remembered as a benefactor. Regarding his grandson I am not surprised about his kindness. Usually the heirs are better than their ancestors. When people are born in richness they don't know greed, they're rather humble and generous. You must also take on account his maternal origen. I'm sure Mrs. Frick wasn't ruthless as her husband.
ReplyDelete