John Johnstone Wallack was born in New York City on New Year’s Day 1820. But the newborn did not stay in the city for long. His British acting parents were in New York on their first tour and the baby boy was soon taken back home. He was educated in England and at the age of 20 was commissioned a lieutenant in the British Army. But Wallack preferred the stage to the barracks and left the army for a life in the theater.
Wallack’s passion for acting came naturally—his father James
William Wallack was an actor. Using the
name Allan Field, he toured with his father.
When he appeared in Dublin as Don Pedro in “Much Ado About Nothing” in
1842 he changed his stage name to John Wallack Lester.
He was back in New York in 1847 where he debuted at the New
Broadway Theatre. While he appeared in Shakespearean
roles in various Manhattan theatres, his father opened the hulking Wallack’s
Theatre at the northeast corner of Broadway and 13th Street on
September 25, 1861.
Designed in the German Romanesque “Rundbogenstil” style, its many arched openings could not relieve the heaviness of its red brick mass. Yet the building had delightful decorative touches. At the corner a story-tall oriel window terminated in a balcony within a concave niche. Ornate sculptural ornaments filled the spandrels between the colossal second story windows. On the 13th Street side, the fourth and fifth floors slanted back as a high mansard roof, partly broken by a giant arched stained window that interrupted the flat cornice.
Designed in the German Romanesque “Rundbogenstil” style, its many arched openings could not relieve the heaviness of its red brick mass. Yet the building had delightful decorative touches. At the corner a story-tall oriel window terminated in a balcony within a concave niche. Ornate sculptural ornaments filled the spandrels between the colossal second story windows. On the 13th Street side, the fourth and fifth floors slanted back as a high mansard roof, partly broken by a giant arched stained window that interrupted the flat cornice.
Before the alterations, a second entrance cut into the corner -- photo NYPL Collection |
James W. Wallack, Sr. lived only three years after opening
his theatre, and upon his death in 1864 John Lester Wallack took over as sole
proprietor and manager--as well as leading actor.
In his 1919 book “A History of the Theatre in America” Arthur
Hornblow remembered the dazzling seasons here.
“In this new Wallack’s, for more than twenty years the most famous
playhouse in America, some of the greatest triumphs connected with the name of
Wallack were achieved. For the lavishness
of its productions and the brilliancy of its casts, this theatre has never been
equaled in this country.”
John Lester (Wallack) dressed as Benedick in Much Ado About Nothing -- A History of the Theatre in America, 1919 (copyright expired) |
photo NYPL Collection |
In 1874 Lester produced what would be his greatest
success. He nearly did not accept Dion
Boucicault’s Irish drama, “The Shaughraun,” because he feared audiences would
not be able to pronounce the title. But
Boucicault’s reputation convinced him.
Producer-playwright David Belasco pronounced Boucicault “the greatest
genius of the theatre at that time.”
According to theater historian Lewis Hardee, “On Saturday evening, November 14, a crowd of eager spectators dressed in their finery, drawn by word that The Shaughraun would be a special event. They pulled up in their carriages and stepped down from trolleys and omnibuses, filed into the theatre, and filled it from parquet to roof. They were not to be disappointed.”
An 1874 cabinet card captures the playwright, along with John Gilbert and Ione Burke, in a scene from Shaughraun at Wallack's Theatre -- NYPL Collection |
A light carriage pauses before the gates to Wallack's Theatre around 1875 -- photo NYPL Collection. |
The New York Times remarked on the new German company. “The company of the theatre is large, and for
the most part, competent; the policy which was once esteemed to be the
safeguard of true stage art, and which is now ridiculed by practical directors
and other believers in the long run system—sharpens their dexterity and keeps
them on the alert and mentally active.”
But Neuendorff had overestimated the popularity of his
theater group. The venue was too large and,
faced with serious competition from other German theatrical groups, the Germania
failed. Before completing his second
season in the old Wallack’s Theatre, Neuendorff closed the doors on March 24,
1883.
Later than year it was renamed the Star Theatre, managed by
Lester’s longtime business partner, Theodore Moss. Although the interiors had just been redone,
Moss remodeled them again. On August 21, 1883 The New York Times reported “Artists,
masons, and carpenters have been busy during the Summer preparing the interior
of the Star Theatre (Wallack’s old house) for the coming season, and when it is
thrown open to the public next Monday evening its old patrons will hardly
recognize it.’
Moss covered the walls with “rich paper, the prominent color
of which is gold,” and he gilded the iron railings. The domed ceiling was painted by the artist
Goatcher. “The prevailing colors are
gold and deep blue,” said The Times, “which tapers off to a very light blue on
the outer circle, giving the effect great height to the dome.”
The stage was completely rebuilt and was now “composed of a
vast number of pieces, and can be taken entirely apart if desired. Traps can be arranged in any portion of it
without cutting, and platforms can be raised at any point without calling in
the aid of a carpenter. It is claimed to
be the best practical stage in America.”
The tourist guide “How to Know New York City” called the
newly redecorated Star’s auditorium “large and brilliant.”
Yet despite the star-filled productions such as Dickens’ "The
Pickwick Papers" in 1887, the Star Theatre felt the need to lure more crowds.. And so the interiors were redecorated again
in 1888. The dome was repainted in “the
Italian Renaissance order,” said The Times.
“In the centre is a huge star, the tones being of the most delicate
tints of blue, gray, and gold. In the
centre of this, above a huge electric light, is a large ventilator to be kept
constantly revolving, but noiseless in its action.”
New proscenium boxes were installed, upholstered in green,
blue and gold with scarlet satin damask draperies and gray-green plush. The balcony was raised two and a half feet to
reduce viewing obstruction and the chairs throughout were reupholstered in
scarlet velvet.
“Thus improved the Star starts out for the season one of the
most attractive and cozy theatres in the city,” remarked the newspaper. The auditorium could now seat 1,750 persons.
It was not all Dickens and comedy in the Star Theatre,
however. In 1888 the auditorium was the
scene of the presentation of the National League pennant to the Brooklyn
Giants. Among the entertainments that
evening was DeWolf Hopper’s second public recitation of “Casey at the Bat.”
The Broadway and 13th Street neighborhood, by the
turn of the century, was less one of theaters and entertainment as it was the
garment and millinery center. On April
7, 1901 New Yorkers were saddened to read in The New York Times “The theatre
built by the Wallacks in 1861, in association with Theodore Moss, on Broadway
at Thirteenth Street, and which was for twenty years the abiding place of the
Wallack stock company, and later, after the stock company had moved still
further up town, continued to present great stars up to 1895, is to be torn
down. The old Star Theatre is to make
way for a clothing house.”
The Times somehow procured one of the programs from opening
night in 1861. Although the handbill was
“crude,” the reporter noted “However the art of praising one’s wares was not
undiscovered, as may be seen in the description of the building, claiming that
it is absolutely the most magnificent in the whole world.”
Directly across the street were the offices of American
Mutoscope—an early motion picture company.
The firm set up a camera to take exposures every four minutes during
every 8-hour day while the demolition of the old Wallack’s Theatre
progressed. When the building was gone,
the film was produced—a two minute motion picture called "The Demolishing and
Building Up the Star Theatre.”
Movie goers sat in the dark and, as the film commenced, saw
a normal Manhattan street scene. There
was the Star Theatre as men in derby hats and women in shirtwaists busily crossed the
street and dismounted from trolleys.
Suddenly the speed increased and the street cars and
passersby whisked by at lightning speed.
Window sashes disappeared, then nighttime engulfed the structure for
moments, before sunlight quickly reappeared.
Demolition workers sped along the roof like insects as the height of
the building decreased before the audience’s eyes. On nearby buildings the canvas awnings rolled
out, then in, in a dizzying manner.
Little by little the Star Theatre crumbled away until it was
no more. And then, to the surprise of
the audience, it began arising from the rubble. The inventive movie producers reversed the
action and the movie-goers were amazed to see the entire structure rise
again. But the film was more than a
gimmick. The American Mutoscope Company
meant for the film to symbolize New York City’s continuous building, razing and
rebuilding.
Wallack’s Theatre, at one time the most famous and
illustrious theater in New York and possibly the country, was no more. Few people today know that it stood on the
corner of Broadway and 13th Street and the names of the legendary thespians
who trod its boards are largely forgotten.
Wonderful article. Thank you.
ReplyDelete