|Until 2010 the 200-year old house was hidden behind fire escapes, metal signs and security gates -- photo http://www.flickriver.com/photos/mateox/sets/72157620218761738/|
With the Revolutionary War over and the British occupation ended, the Common Council in 1787 ordered that the shoreline be extended with landfill 65 feet into the Hudson River. Seven years later the Council passed an ordinance to create Greenwich Street, stretching from the Battery to Rector Street. The new street, completed by 1797, gently followed the shoreline and the views it offered along with the cooling river breezes in summer attracted wealthy homeowners.
Before long graceful brick mansions lined the street, creating one of the most fashionable residential areas in the city. Wealthy merchant Robert Dickey spent $11,017 on three lots in 1809 and by November construction was underway on two houses at Nos. 69 and 71. Dickey dealt in imported goods including tea, spices, coffee rice and “Japan wood.”
|The beautiful Anne Brown Dickey would have chosen the rich furnishings of No. 67|
A grassy yard separated the homes from their outbuildings that faced Lumber Street to the rear—two stables, a coach house and a storehouse. In 1810 the Dickeys were living in the larger home, No. 71, while construction was still being completed and Dickey ran his trade from a little building in the rear at No. 8 Lumber Street.
Dickey and his wife, the former Anne Brown, lived here until 1820. The successful importer was one of the richest men in New York with an estate of approximately $20,000 in 1815. As did most of Manhattan’s wealthy citizens, they owned a sprawling country estate far north of the city—a 43-acre property overlooking the Hudson near the Jumel manor.
Financial problems befell Dickey when a ship was lost in a storm at sea in 1819. Insurance company lawsuits and outstanding loans and mortgages forced him to sell his Greenwich Street properties.
In March of 1822 the Common Council renumbered the addresses and the Dickey mansion became No. 67. Two years later Peter Schmerhorn took title of the house. With his brother, Abraham, he was a partner in Schermerhorn, Banker & Co. and Shermerhorn, Willis & Co., as well as a director of the Bank of New York.
At the time Schermerhorn took possession of the house, William Bayard Jr. had been living in it since 1821. Highly prominent, Bayard was a successful merchant with LeRoy, Bayard & Co., a director of the Bank of America, President of the Chamber of Commerce, President of the Savings Bank and a partner in the Tontine Coffee House.
With the knowledge the Bayard would be leaving in 1824, Schermerhorn advertised the house in the New York Evening Post in 1823:
FOR SALE, OR TO LET, The house at No. 67 Greenwich street, with the stable and coach house on Lumber street, in the rear, as now occupied by William Bayard, Jun. Esq. The house is about 40 feet front on Greenwich street and has every requisite for an elegant and convenient establishment. ALSO—The large fireproof Store in the rear of the above, on Lumber street, having double spacious cellars, and is well calculated for a wine or importing merchant.
The ad worked. Equally prominent banker and merchant Nicholas Low moved in, staying from 1824 to 1826.
When dry goods merchant John C. Henderson leased the house beginning in 1827 he and his wife took boarders, including the imminent philanthropist and politician Theodore Lyman, Jr. On February 25, 1827 Lyman wrote to Henry Clay, a portion of which read:
“Whenever you happen to have a moment of leizure [sic], may I beg you to do me the favor to address a letter to me to the care of Mrs. Henderson No. 67 Greenwich Street, New York. Have the goodness, also, to accept my most sincere and particular acknowledgments for your very obliging and valuable attentions to me at Washington, which I shall, ever, remember with the greatest satisfaction.”
At the time lower Manhattan was changing as businesses overtook residential areas. In 1828 James Fenimore Cooper noted with some melancholy “commerce is gradually taking possession of the whole of the lower extremity of the island, though the Bay, the battery, and the charming Broadway, still cause many of the affluent to depart with reluctance.” Yet No. 67 continued to attract well-to-do boarders, including merchants Henry Butler, Minot C. Morgan, Daniel C. Eaton, Edward Bill.
The Schermerhorn family retained possession of the property as “Mrs. Ludlow” ran her boarding house here in 1837. That year New-York As It Is described it as a “Principal Private Boarding House for the accommodation of transient boarders.” Elisha Foot took over operation of the boarding house from 1842 through 1844. But by now the neighborhood was noticeably changing.
In 1851 there were fifteen boarders living in No. 67. All were working class men like James Dooley who, on December 22, 1852, was drinking at a porter-house down the street at No. 18 Greenwich Street. Dooley got into what The New York Times described as “a wrangling dispute…about some trifling matter” with Henry L. Petesch. After “hard words passed,” Petesch drew a pistol from his pocket and shot Dooley. In particularly eloquent Victorian prose the newspaper described the attack.
“A portion of the contents of the weapon took effect in the left breast of Dooley, and seriously injured him.”
Petesch was arrested, charged with attempted murder. It was the sort of affair that never happened to residents of No. 67 during Robert Dickey’s time.
The house served, as well, as a polling place for the Second Election District of the First Ward in 1854 and as the office of the American Industrial Association. The purpose of the Association was “to provide for an obtain employment for farmers and laborers” and it would be here for at least a decade.
In July 1856 the British ship the Orient docked in New York, carrying the first of 3,800 English laborers from the Crimea. The men had been employed as excavators, or “navies,” for two or three years. Now referred to as the “Army work corps,” they crowded into the office of the American Industrial Association seeking work. The Secretary of the Association promised that “no difficulty will be found in giving profitable employment to all who may seek our shores with the intention of becoming industrious and peaceful citizens.”
Frederick L. Seeley ran his business from No. 67 at the same time, a “licensed keeper of intelligence offices.”
Three years later, in 1860, things continued to go downhill for the once-proud mansion which was still owned by the Schermerhorn family. Herman H. Stollmeyer ran an “emigrant boarding house” and when German immigrant John Rutman arrived from Bremen on July 16, Stollmeyer hatched a scheme.
He managed to get the new arrival drunk on his first night in the boarding house, then convinced him to take an interest in the business. Rutman agreed and gave Stollmeyer $100 in cash and a note for $50 payable in sixty days. The following evening Mrs. Stollmeyer, an attractive young woman, requested the German to escort her on a stroll.
Herman Stollmeyer then “discovered” the two, flew into a rage and “thrust him from the house,” according to The Times, canceling the business deal. The immigrant was not so naïve, however, and before long Stollmeyer was arrested for conspiracy to defraud.
Stollmeyer’s problems did not end there. The same year the Sanitary Police, saying that the property “required cleansing,” gave him three days to clean up the premises. Otherwise it would be cleaned at public expense, “the cost to be a lien on the property until paid.”
In 1869 Trinity Place (Lumber Street had been renamed in 1843) was widened and the house lost the outbuildings and most of the rear yard. In the meantime, the Greenwich Street Elevated railroad had been built in 1868. Before long a second elevated train would be running behind the house as well. The neighborhood declined even more.
The New York Times noted on April 9, 1871 that “For several years past the lower half of the City has been infested with basement houses of prostitution of the lowest character.” Among these was No. 67 Greenwich Street. On April 8 detectives and police simultaneously raided 29 disorderly houses. “From these places thirty men and ninety-two women and girls, of the most degraded and homely description, were taken into custody, but the male proprietors of the places, by some strange mischance, were nearly all absent at the time of the raid, and so escape arrest.”
Although he slipped through the fingers of police, a warrant was issued for Charles Iker, the proprietor of the vile den at No. 67.
A year later Edmond H. Schermerhorn commissioned architect Detlef Lienau to remodel the house. He removed the pitched roof which most likely had dormers; raising the fourth floor to a full story. The original splayed lintels on the second and third floors were replaced with plain stone lintels and he added a modern pedimented hood above the entrance door. The renovations cost Schermerhorn $10,000.
As the century progressed, however, the make-up of the tenants improved. Mary A. Hendricks, an elementary school teachers was here in 1875 and Fitzhue Smith, a bail bondsman, lived here in 1895. The 1890 census listed fifty-seven residents in No. 67—all of them Irish.
In 1900 A. McRoberts obtained permission from the city “to maintain a wagon for the sale of milk, milk shakes, etc., in Printing House Square, at a point near the Franklin Statue…on the condition that no horse shall be attached to the wagon…and that the street shall be kept free from dirt and refuse from the same.”
Nineteen-year old Leslie Garcia was working as a clerk in the ground floor business here in 1902 when she got involved in an arson-burglary scheme. A 74-year old second-hand book dealer, Andrew M. Copeland, convinced a group of youngsters to set fire to Public School No. 67 during school hours. When the children and teachers all filed out of the building, the youths hurriedly gathered up books and small valuables, like one teacher’s gold watch and chain valued at $60. They were able to make off with $700 worth of Latin and Greek “grammars.”
Hugh Brosman, a laborer, brought more positive publicity to No. 67 Greenwich Street when he lived here on January 17, 1909. On that day a young manicurist, Albertine Dequer, was walking along the icy edge of the river in Battery Park. Suddenly she was in the frigid water.
Private F. H. Crane of the Signal Corps was on the second deck of the Bedlow’s Island steamer Herman Caswell speaking to the captain when he heard shouts. He plunged into the river but, according to The New York Tribune, “the woman became frightened and struggled with the soldier, and for a few minutes it looked as if both would sink.”
But Hugh Brosman had also dived into the river and managed to help Crane pull the girl to the seawall. Four firemen from the fireboat fleet dragged the three to the top of the wall.
For several years around this time builder Charles Parkinson ran his business from here. The esteemed contractor was responsible for major Manhattan structures including the Potter Building, the New York Stock Exchange and 41 Park Row.
After owning the house for nearly a century, the Schermerhorn family sold it as part of “the Carpenter estate” in October, 1919 to Rose A. McGuigan. McGuigan’s family and partners would retain the property until 1960.
The long-term ownership nearly did not happen, however. In 1920 The New York Tribune reported that Rose McGuigman had filed plans for renovating the buildings at Nos. 65 and 67 Greenwich Street “into a six-story office building, with stores” at a cost of $25,000. The newspaper named C. B. Meyers as architect.
|The Robert Dickey House is the last surviving Federal style building with a bowed rear facade -- photo by Alice Lum|
For some reason the transformation was never done. In 1922 McGuigman did, however, add a one-story commercial addition to the building facing Trinity Place, designed by architects Zipkes, Wolff & Kudroff.
In 1940 the city began preparations for the mammoth construction project, the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel. Dozens of the still-surviving Federal houses like No. 67 were demolished, many of them very similar, including the bowed rear façade. One by one they fell until only No. 67, miraculously, remained.
|In 1965 the bowed rear facade rises above the Trinity Place extension--home to a cigar store and 5-and-10-cent shop -- photo Library of Congress|
Today the Robert Dickey house is all that remains of the once elegant and fashionable residential district of Greenwich Street. It is one of only seven houses built before 1810 south of Chambers Street and is the last remaining Federal house with a bowed façade.
|photo by Alice Lum|
UPDATE: In 2019 work is underway to incorporate the shell of the two-century-old mansion into the base of the rising 42-story residential building. The Dickey mansion will be part of a school within its lower floors.
|The gutted exterior walls will be incorporated into the 42-story 77 Greenwich Street being erected next door. photo by Pam Frederick of Tribeca Citizen|
Didnt mention if this structure is landmarked and if it's not, why not? It is an amazing survivor and needs to be cared for. I have worked downtown for over 15 years and the place always looks deserted and in need of repairs, let alone a full restoration which probably is not going to happen anytime soon.ReplyDelete
The house was designated a New York City landmark in 2005, despite the abuse it has suffered. Unfortunately, landmark status does not guarantee preservation; but it looks like something is being done.Delete
Amazing Story! When walking by one of these few surviving former early residences lower Manhattan, I often wonder what their stories were. Now I know one!ReplyDelete
My great great grand father used to live in this building for over 30 years from 1920. He was an immigrant from Slowakia, came to New York by boat to make money. I often pass by this building and wish I could go inside to see how he lived. If anybody has information on how and who to contact regarding this and other information, please contact me. Martina.firstname.lastname@example.org Thank you, you dont know how much this means to me and my family.ReplyDelete
In 2005, I did some research about this building in order to testify on its behalf before the Landmarks Preservation Commission. Some remarkable, providential things had happened. In 1845, a huge fire engulfed much of the city east of Broadway, but it stopped 350 feet from the Dickey house. Between 1850 and 1950, over a century, every single house around #67 was torn down, either for other buildings or for the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel. Why not #67 too? In the early 1980s, the owners could have demolished but chose not to? Why? They were neglecting it badly, allowing it to disintegrate slowly--and then in 2001 the house was spared once again during the World Trade Center attacks. I suggested that we should stop counting on miracles to save this distinguished house and urged the commissioners to designate it and save it for good. They did.ReplyDelete
Great now that its landmarked, what does it take for a negligent owner to actually stop the building from falling into ruin? This is a priceless, 200 year plus, architectural survivor and landmark or not, it wont be saved for future generations unless somebody starts to maintain it. The place looks empty and abandoned. Any updates or information since the scaffolding photo was taken?ReplyDelete
Unfortunately, landmark status does not stop what is sometimes called "demolition by neglect." I have not seen the building in about a year--when the photo was taken. I need to get down there to get an updated photo and status.Delete
Indeed to get down there again soon, not far from me but the WTC is in the way. Long haul over the highway and back, but I may be able to cut through memorial garden.ReplyDelete
I have been passing this building repeatedly over the last several weeks. Fascinated by the wonderful curved structure of the rear facade. Thinking what fine rooms they would bee in which to live. My interest was so intense it I went to the internet and have now discovered it's fantastic history. It is so close to all the fine new construction that is going on downtown. it seems a realistic appraisal that section of lower Greenwich, just about a block long, will soon be going uphill once again. I did not recognize it as Federal but how fine this little historic gem could be, saved among the family of beautiful skyscrapers going up near it. If somehow the owner could be made to see its real value, they could really do something for the city, of which they own a small, but very fine part.ReplyDelete
Getting #67 designated as a landmark saved it's life! This spring plans were approved for a new tower next door to contain offices and a school. Part of the requirements for the projects was building around and preserving 9to some extent) #67 since it is a Historical Landmark. Otherwise, it might have been demolished just like all the other historical buildings around it. They are bricking over the facade and making some major floorplan changes, but removing the back 1-story addition among other things. Here's the article about it, including the developer's presentation slides showing the layout of the building inside: http://newyorkyimby.com/2016/03/less-overhang-paves-way-for-landmarks-approval-of-mixed-use-tower-at-77-greenwich-street.htmlReplyDelete
To those still interested in the Lower Manhattan neighborhood and the fate of the old buildings that remain, you can send an e-mail to get on the mailing list of the Friends of the Lower West Side (FLWS). FLWS is a preservation group making every effort to preserve this neighborhood and its history. One of our founders is a professional tour guide and we frequently give tours of the area to anyone interested in the history of Lower Manhattan and its preservation. You are welcome to join us. E-mail: email@example.comReplyDelete