On November 10, 1905 The New York Times reported on a
ground-breaking concept in New York theater.
Heinrich Conried, a director of the Metropolitan Opera House, envisioned
a theater which would “present plays that are the standards of all nations and
the current American plays that are clean and sane. Opera comique is to be presented twice a
week.”
Conried’s idea, which was to be
called the National Theatre, stepped away from traditional productions in that
they would all be presented in English; “the works of foreigners all being
translated into English.” Even the
classical Greek plays were to be translated.
To ensure historic accuracy, a
Committee of Fashions would approve all costumes. “Especial effort is to be made to have the
costumes exactly represent the time of the play,” reported The Times. And for plays set in modern times, “If the
leading actor wears a silk hat the other players in the society part of the
cast will wear the same hats. His coat
and everything he wears are to be the standards.”
To finance the National Theatre,
Conrad enlisted the wealthiest of Manhattan society—including John Jacob Astor,
J. P. Morgan, William and Cornelius Vanderbilt, Otto Kahn, August Belmont and
Jacob Schiff, among others. In addition,
30 boxes were offered at $100,000 each; but the purchasers would have to pass
committee approval. “They are to be
selected by a committee, which is to endeavor to select people of undoubted
social standing.”
Three months later, in March 1906,
a contest was held to select the theater's design.
Nine of the city’s most prestigious firms submitted plans: Barney &
Chapman, Carrere & Hastings, Delano & Aldrich, J. H. Freedlander,
Hopping, Koen & Huntington, George B. Post & Sons, Robertson &
Potter, Trowbridge & Livingston, and Warren & Wetmore. The plans were considered by a committee
including Stanford White, Donn Barber, Otto H. Kahn, Charles T. Barney and
Edgar V. Seeler.
By the time the submissions were
received, the name of the building had been changed to the New Theatre. The architects were directed to include an
auditorium with a parquet, “two tiers of boxes and two or three galleries above
the boxes. The seating capacity is to be
about 2000. A portion of the roof is to
be enclosed under glass as a palm garden.
There will also be a room for use as a dramatic school.”
The commission was won by Beaux
Arts masters, Carrere & Hastings, whose masterful New York Public Library
was rising on Fifth Avenue. Ground was
broken in December 1906 on Central Park West and 62nd Street far
north of the established theater district.
That same month it was announced
that Heinrich Conreid had been named as the theater’s director—a position The
Times already deemed a “difficult post.”
The newspaper predicted that the running of the immense venue would be
fraught with “knotty problems.”
Luckily for the venture, its
founders had nearly unlimited wealth. On
December 16, as excavation had just begun, construction costs had risen to $2
million.
Nearly a year after the deep
foundations were begun, Carrere & Hastings filed plans in August 1907 for “what
will be the costliest playhouse ever erected in this city,” according to The
Times. In the eight months since ground-breaking, the
cost had risen another 30 percent, to $3 million.
Work on the foundation reveals the massive size of the theater. Central Park West is to the left, looking south. collection of the Library of Congress |
The architects’ plans included a “grand
colonnade” on the Park side with five entrances that opened into the large
entrance hall with two staircases leading to a second floor foyer. The arrangement was patterned “after the
Continental opera houses,” according to the architects.
American Architect and Building News, July 21, 1906 (copyright expired) |
The special boxes were set aside
for the 46 millionaire founders. The
massive auditorium would contain an additional 2,500 seats. In addition newspapers reported that “The
roof of the theatre over the auditorium will be fitted up as a palm garden, and
in other parts of the building will be a restaurant and flower and
confectionery booths for the convenience of patrons.”
A dramatic school, one of the
prerequisites, included a smaller hall and 12 schoolrooms. The optimistic investors expected “that it will
be more than self-sustaining, and have expressed their intention of devoting
all of the net profit to the school for dramatic art, an actors’ pension fund,
and a permanent endowment fund,” reported The Times on August 17, 1907.
But no sooner had the plans been
filed than the wealthy investors brought things to a halt. Thomas Hastings issued an explanation that
there had been “confusion” and that the delay was not the fault of his firm.
Revised plans were released on
February 20, 1908 by a frustrated Carrere & Hastings. The founders seem to have focused on the
luxuries of the patrons rather than the functions of the theater. The new plans included “Ample provisions…for
a foyer, grand staircase, retiring and cloak rooms, smoking room, entrances,
vestibules, elevators, restaurants, roof garden, buffet, quarters for
confectioner and florist, and similar accommodations,” said The New York Times.
The newspaper said the style “will
follow the Italian Renaissance” and would be clad in Indiana limestone. The symmetrical facade smacked vaguely of the
Public Library, and featured 22 entrances and handsome rounded corners.
The growing problem was that the
founders, highly involved in the design, were businessmen with no knowledge or
understanding of the theater. Thomas
Hastings seems to have foreseen disaster and quickly attempted to absolve his
firm from blame. The day following the
submission of the plans, The Times reported “The architects have tried to make
it possible for every person occupying a seat to hear and see everything. The acoustics will be as nearly perfect, said
Mr. Hastings, as possible.”
The cavernous auditorium, however,
in the days before miked actors, made “nearly perfect” acoustics impossible. New York theater-goers anticipated the
problem even as the building still rose.
Newspapers were flooded with critical letters. It prompted Thomas Hastings to write a defensive letter
to the editor of The New York Times on April 18, 1908 which said in part “It is
undoubtedly the somewhat large seating capacity of the house, and the fact that
it is being built upon an entire avenue block of land, which has led your
correspondents to believe that the house is to be too large.” He defended the plans, saying “there is one
distinctive feature in the design which is not generally known, and that is we
have adopted what is called the ‘fan-shaped’ plan instead of the well-known ‘horseshoe’
plan.” Hastings assured readers that the
players would be heard in the farthest seats.
The Times gently contradicted him
the following day, expressing worries that “The affairs of the New Theatre are
now in the hands of a group of gentlemen who have no relation to it except that
of mere ownership.”
Finally, in November 1909, the New
Theatre was completed. Sadly, Heinrich
Conried who had conceived the project, never saw his vision. He died in April 1909.
The auditorium was sumptuously decorated. bottom photograph from the collection of the Library of Congress. |
The theater’s staggering interiors
caused The New York Times to call it a “Palace of Drama.” William K. Vanderbilt had had the ceiling
paintings by French artist Paul-Jacques-Aimé Baudry removed from his ballroom and
installed in the foyer. The marble and
gold walls were hung with high-end artwork.
W. K. Vanderbilt donated the ceiling paintings. The New-York-Architect, November 1909 (copyright expired) |
There were no fewer than 50 staircases within the building, leading to
boxes, a tearoom “in a Wedgewood effect,” retiring rooms, library, smoking
rooms, and private corridors for the box holders. Between the Founders’ Room and the Library
was a private corridor “furnished by the founders themselves and is remarkable
for its taste and beauty,” reported The New York Times.
Opening night was sold out a full week before. The extravagant production of Shakespeare’s Antony
and Cleopatra was attended by a who’s-who of Manhattan society. London drama critic A. B. Walkey had come
especially for the event. In a cable
later, he mentioned the audience of “the magnificent palace” that night. “Paris and for that matter London, outside of
Covent Garden in the season, could show no spectacle so brilliant as this New
York crowd, such a display of aristocratic beauty in the women, such a blaze of
diamonds. All New York, socially
speaking, was there, and it was a sight worth seeing.”
But already problems arose. Following
the first act, patrons complained of “difficulty of hearing what was said on
the stage.” The builder, Otto M Eidlitz,
rushed to find the problem. He reported
that it was the ventilating system causing a hum and corrected the condition.
Another Englishman in the audience was actor-manager Henry Miller. Looking past the sumptuous décor and the moneyed
patrons, he announced “In my opinion the scheme of The New Theatre is all
wrong. Our drama does not owe its
existence to any effort of the wealthy classes.
It was suffering which produced it, not wealth. This gilded incubator in Central Park West
won’t hatch any great drama.”
Henry Miller’s prediction, along with those of hundreds of New Yorkers,
soon became evident. The expense of
maintaining the massive theater and the cost of the elaborate productions it
required outweighed the income. Three
months after opening Carrere & Hastings was brought back to convert the
roof garden restaurant into a theater for light entertainment.
Even the restaurant had not been profitable—owing mostly to
its inability to obtain a liquor license because of complaints by the nearby School
of the Society for Ethical Culture. So
now the architects designed a stage for light opera concerts and other
productions.
The firm would soon be remodeling the main auditorium as well. On February 20, 1910 manager Winthrop Ames
admitted that “a mistake had been made in the construction of The New Theatre.” He confessed that it was simply too large for
dramatic productions.
The New York Times reported “Mr. Ames’s announcement was made in
replying to criticisms regarding the architectural interior of the playhouse,
particularly in regard to its acoustic properties.” The alterations involved removing boxes and
rearranging seating, at a cost of $15,000.
But even that was not successful.
By March 1911 the New Theatre had lost $400,000. The founders gave up and announced that the
building would be leased “to whomever may wish to use it, just as Carnegie Hall
is let.” William K. Vanderbilt announced
that the founders would “abandon” the structure and carry on “the movement of
giving high-class drama somewhere else in the city.”
The millionaires found a tenant in Liebler & Co. who agreed on a
$75,000 per year lease. The company’s
managing director, George C. Tyler said “he will make productions of a
character and scale suited to the auditorium of that house. No play that requires a small theatre for its
best interpretation will be attempted there, but only those productions which
call for large scenic effects and plenty of stage room will be given,”
reported The New York Times.
Liebler & Co.’s first production in what it renamed the Century
Theatre was the extravaganza The Garden of Allah. In addition to the elaborate sets, there
was a herd of horses and camels, and Middle-Easterners were imported to add authenticity
to the cast. This alone caused some
upheaval.
The men, who spoke no English, were headed by Sie Hassan Ben Ali. He had his hands full on their arrival in the
city. The Times reported that he “had a
fearful time in the Subway the day they reached New York, for he lost his hold
on them and they rode riotously in groups that scattered to the Bronx,
Brooklyn, and Van Cortlandt Park. It
took him twelve hours to reassemble them.”
On December 1, 1911 two of the foreigners walked across the avenue into
Central Park. The Times reported that
the “Mohammedans” were tempted by a squirrel “and for lack of a stone they
threw their sandals They were in full
pursuit when a large, rough-speaking heathen in blue clothes and buttons of
gold leaped upon them and bade them begone from the garden.”
More trouble came about two weeks later when a herd of horses were waiting
on 63rd Street to be led into the theater An automobile spooked them and six jumped
the wall into Central Park. Six others
ran towards Broadway, then to 68th Street.
Theater employees jumped into action, catching five of the horses in
Central Park. The other who had jumped
the wall was never found. A crowd of boys
and policemen finally subdued the others; although one had to be put down
because it broke its foreleg.
Liebler & Co. produced concerts on the roof where patrons could
either enjoy the open air in hot weather, or be protected in the glass
enclosure during rainy or cold weather.
Despite its lavish productions, Liebler & Co. could not make a go
of it. In 1913 the theater was taken
over by the Century Opera Company, which changed the name of the building to
the Century Opera House. Interestingly,
its manager, Milton Aborn, had the same idea that Heinrich Conreid had
had. The operas would be performed in
English. The first season included the
stagings of Samson and Delilah, and Salome. The New York Times openly wondered about
performing these in English. “How the
language will fit in either case is not now a matter for pertinent conjecture.”
In the meantime, the original founders were bearing the financial
weight of a non-profitable white elephant, no matter how attractive. On New Year’s Day 1915 William K. Vanderbilt
added $100,000 to the already existing mortgage of $1.75 million. Then in May the Century Opera Company
declared bankruptcy.
In September Ned Wayburn’s Productions, Inc. opened in the building,
and like its predecessors, tried a new direction. In September 1915 Theatre Magazine reported “The
house is to be conducted as a music hall after the manner of London and
continental music halls.”
According to Wayburn he had spent $150,000 in renovations aimed at increasing
profits. In addition to the musical
revues in the main auditorium, there were areas for dancing and popular
music. “The Vanderbilt room, which is
the Circassian walnut room just off the mezzanine promenade, will become refreshment
and dancing room. A negro band will be
stationed here, and will play for dancing,” said the magazine.
One of the former tea rooms was converted to one of 10 private dining rooms. The restaurants could accommodate 1,000
patrons in all. The roof garden and theater was
made into a dance club, as was the former Tap Room in the basement. Wayburn remodeled other spaces for use by the
New York Yacht Club and the Automobile Club.
The first production, Town Topics, had a cast of several hundred
and was marketed as “the biggest musical entertainment ever staged” in New
York, outside of the Hippodrome. It
opened the last week of September and brought in between $12,000 and $20,000 a
week. Again, the problem of producing
the massive shows necessary for the venue was unsupportable. The cost of running Town Topics was
$20,000, so it lost money from opening night.
One month after opening, Wayburn’s grand music hall was shut down.
The lease was taken over by impresarios Charles Dillingham and Florenz
Ziegfeld, Jr. On November 6, 1916 they
opened with The Century Girl, a three act musical revue with music by
Victor Herbert and Irving Berlin. The
Times was overwhelmed. “This is a lavish
and vastly entertaining mixture of spectacle and vaudeville. It is something like a production of the ‘Follies’
magnified past calculation; it is altogether like nothing else to be seen anywhere
in America.”
The newspaper was certain the Ziegfeld and Dillingham had found the
solution. “The world and his wife
attended last evening’s brilliant premiere and will be there all the rest of
the season.” It reported that the pair
had joined forces to create “what is at present—and probably long will be—the greatest
music hall in the world.” It added “The
curse is off the Century.”
In what the newspaper called another “wave of the Dillingham-Zeigfeld wand”
the rooftop was transformed into the Cocoanut Grove; “a rendezvous for those to
whom the witching hour is but the shank of the evening, who, in the dead vast
and middle of the night, feel stealing o’er them an unconquerable impulse to
eat, drink, dance, and see a bit of vaudeville.”
The Cocoanut Grove featured popular entertainers, chorus girls with little
clothing, and vaudeville skits. It
remained opened until 4:00 a.m. Its
great success was attacked, once again, by the Society for Ethical Culture
which realized there were drinks being served.
On March 30, 1917 an order from the courts prevented further selling of
alcohol because the closest door to the school was within 300 feet.
Flo Ziegfeld was infuriated and promised an appeal. He pointed out that the closest doors were
exit doors, not entrances, “proved by the fact that they did not even have
outside knobs.” He added that if the
courts were not satisfied with this argument, “he would willingly seal the
doors with stone and mortar.” With the
passage of Prohibition, it made little difference.
In 1920 the theater’s management was taken over by the Shubert
Brothers. Despite the elaborate
productions staged here over the years, it would be The Miracle in 1924
that outdid anything prior. The drama by
Max Reinhardt, with music by Engelbert Humperdinck, required 700 actors in
period costumes. But it was the set by
Norman-Bel Geddes that amazed.
It required 300 craftsmen five months to put together the $600,000 set
which transformed the entire auditorium into a Gothic cathedral, including 11
40-foot stained glass windows, a thirty-foot high altar, 20 50-foot columns.
The entire theater was transformed into a medieval cathedral. Note how even the side boxes are incorporated into the design of the set. photo from the collection of the New York Public Library |
The production required a pipe organ, cathedral bells, wind and thunder
machines, and elaborate machinery to move the 24,000-pound scenery either up
and down, or on the massive turntable.
Opening night was reminiscent of the original. In the boxes were patrons with names like
Vanderbilt, Kahn, Harriman, Guggenheim Stokes, and Warburg. Out-of-towners including William Randolph
Hearst and his wife, Mrs. Marshall Field, the Duke and Duchess de Richeliue,
the Duchess of Rutland and Sir Edgar Speyer all attended.
In 1928 the value of the Central Park property far outweighed the value
of the theater. Rumors appeared in
newspapers that the Shuberts were selling.
Then, in May 1929, it was announced that Chanin Construction Company had
purchased the entire block from Central Park West to Broadway for $12 million.
The firm announced it would begin construction on a 65-story commercial
building for the French Government. The
project, slated to cost $50 million, would house that government’s consulate
and offices, as well as a hotel and office space. But neither the French Government nor the
Chanin firm had anticipated the stock market crash later that year.
On October 24, 1930 the Chanins announced that the French project had
been dropped. Instead the Central Park
block would be replaced with a modern 30-story studio apartment building. Two months later demolition began on what The
New York Times unkindly called “Columbus Circle’s whitest elephant.”
Designed by Irwin S. Chanin, the Art Deco-style replacement building was completed
in 1931. The Chanins gave a nod to the
Carrere & Hastings theater by calling it The Century.
Thanks for the post. This theater has always fascinated me. Such a huge and elaborate venue demolished in such a short time. There's a resemblance in the Central Park West side to the Lunt-Fontanne Theatre, also designed by Carrere & Hastings.
ReplyDeleteMy aunt lived in the Century from 1947 until 1997 when she moved back to Michigan. Might have been a 'white elephant' when it was built, but it really is a beautiful building. I spent many summers there and loved every minute of the building, the city, it's a huge part of why I love your blog.
ReplyDeleteWhat a spectacular setting to attend a performance.
ReplyDeleteWhat an incredible theatrical venue and most certainly gone too soon.
ReplyDeleteNightsmusic, the "white elephant" referred to is the former theater, not the apartment block that succeeded it.
ReplyDeleteExactly. Perhaps that paragraph is confusingly worded.
DeleteGorgeous as the Century Theatre was, I understand it was acoustically challenged.
ReplyDelete