The brick and brownstone rowhouse is squeezed in between tall apartment buildings. |
By May 1888 West 72nd Street had already seen significant development. The owners of the nearly 60 residences and more than 100 vacant building plots along the street estimated their combined property value at nearly $8 million. The massive Dakota apartment building facing Central Park and completed four years earlier anchored the wide street. It culminated at Riverside Drive, where elaborate mansions were rising.
That spring the Park Department made plans to pave the
dusty, pothole filled street. But then
it changed its mind. On May 26, 1888 the
Real Estate Record and Builders’ Guide noted “The Park Department showed a
disposition to disband the improvement of West 72d street, as outlined several
months ago, urging want of funds.” The
property owners were not pleased.
The Guide said “The urgent need for the called-for
improvement is generally acknowledged, 72d street being the principal thoroughfare
on the west side and the main artery between the Central Park and Riverside and
West end avenues. Its present condition
is notoriously bad.”
The Park Department’s postponement of paving “stirred up the
property-owners on that handsome street that they got up a petition which…was
signed by the owners of three-quarters of the entire frontage from Central Park
West to Riverside Drive.” Among the
signors was J. Rufus Smith.
The letter from the angry (and wealthy) property owners
changed the Department’s mind again. The
Commissioners voted unanimously to pave 72nd Street “with
macadamized pavement,” and extended the curbs seven feet on each side to allow
space for tree and grass planting.
J. Rufus Smith had much at stake in the paving of 72nd
Street. The improvement would naturally
increase property values and Smith had been busy within the past few years
erecting speculative homes in the area.
(In a single deal in November 1890 he would sweep up 36 lots on the
block bounded by 76th and 77th Streets, between West End
Avenue and Riverside Drive.)
As the paving issue played out, Smith was working with
architect Ralph S. Townsend on an upscale rowhouse at No. 338 West 72nd
Street. The site’s exceptional views looked
northward over Riverside Park and enjoyed unparalleled sunlight and cooling
river breezes in the humid summers.
Completed in 1890, Townsend’s Romanesque Revival residence
stood four stories over the English basement.
Clad in Roman brick, it forewent the abundance of medieval-style
carvings, stocky columns, gargoyles and other creatures that the style
invited. Instead Townsend’s ornamentation
was reserved and dignified.
Townsend used color to break up the visual weight of the
structure. The brownstone base supported
a floor of lighter-colored brown brick, which was followed by two stories clad
in a subtly lighter shade. Between the
arched openings of the top floor and the cornice, the architect used beige
bricks. The progressively
lighter-colored materials gave the visual impression that the weight of the
structure lessened with each floor.
The problem of an adequately-wide staircase hall inside
resulted in a slightly asymmetrical design.
Townsend separated the hallway windows from the two-bay wide rooms with
a hefty pilaster; while the remaining two openings flanked a trim, engaged
column of rounded brick.
As the house was being completed, George Oakes was suffering
from an eye disease, erysipelas. He had
married Jane Austin, daughter of a millionaire broker William Austin. In 1884 Jane was sued by her three brothers
in an ugly court battle over their father’s estate.
For years George
Oakes had been the managing clerk of the elegant Fifth Avenue Hotel; but around
1887 his disease forced him to quit working.
On November 8, 1890 he died in his home at No. 248 West 23rd
Street.
Within months Jane Oakes moved into the new house at No. 338
West 72nd Street, along with son William and his wife, and daughter Jennie. Following the prescribed period of morning,
Jane Oakes threw herself headlong into entertaining in her new home.
Among the prestigious caterers to New York society during the
Gilded Age was Clark. Social columns
were filled with reports of wedding breakfasts, suppers and collations
supplied and “served by Clark.” On
January 24, 1893 The New York Times reported that Jane “gave a dinner party
last night” and gave the names of those on the impressive guest list. The newspaper ended by saying succinctly “Clark
served.”
A far more important entertainment would be held here later
that year. At 8:00 on the evening of October
4, 1893 Jennie was married to George Wilmert Swain, president of the Endicott
Democratic Club. The New-York Tribune
noted “A large reception followed at the home of the bride’s mother, No. 388
West Seventy-second-st.”
Jane Austin Oakes was still here for at least another year,
hosting glittering affairs. But by the
turn of the new century No. 338 was home to Rastus S. Ransom. An
attorney with offices at No. 128 Broadway, Ransom was highly involved in
politics. A former judge of the
Surrogate Courts, he was considered as Police Commissioner in 1901 by
Mayor-elect Seth Low.
Among the influential attorney’s clients was Ella
S. Conkling. Late at night on March 14 his peaceful evening
was interrupted by an unexpected visit from her and two men.
Ella had married well-to-do woolen manufacturer Theodore
Conkling in 1894, but his heavy drinking caused them to soon separate. They reconciled; but Theodore’s intemperance
led to a second separation and, finally, a divorce in November 1899.
Ella Conkling was now making her living by speculating in
real estate. Early in March 1901 she
moved into No. 62 West 70th Street.
On the evening of March 14 she was expecting her real estate lawyers,
Mark Schlessinger and his brother Edward, to discuss business.
When she opened her door at 9:30, instead of the
Schlessingers she was met by her ex-husband.
The New York Times said “He had been drinking, she thought. She tried to slam the door. He was too quick for her, and got in. He finally seized her by the throat. She struggled. Then it was, she said, that the revolver was
used.”
While Ella struggled with Theodore Conkling on the carpet,
Edward and Mark Schlessinger showed up.
While Mark threw himself on Conkling, his brother rushed out the door to
find help. Policeman Owen McKenna was
standing at 70th Street and Columbus Avenue when Schlessinger ran
up.
“There’s a man in here with a gun, and he’s liable to shoot
it!”
When the policeman entered the house, Mark Schlessinger was
holding Conkling down. Ella’s clothing
was torn and she had visible bruising on her neck. “Edward Schlessinger’s lip was twice its
normal size. He said Conkling had hit
him.”
All four were taken to the West 68th Street
Station where charges and counter charges were made, resulting in Conkling’s
arrest. Conkling declined to talk,
other than to say “his call on his ex-wife had been purely social, and that she
had knocked him down and assaulted him.
He had not threatened her.”
Not wanting to wait until morning before starting legal
procedures, the Schlessingers and Ella Conkling went directly from the police
station to Ransom’s house.
Later that year, when President William H. McKinley was shot
by 28-year old anarchist Leon Czolgosz on September 6, Ransom quickly made his
thoughts known. In an address to the
West Side Workmen’s League the following evening, he said:
“It is one of the most dastardly acts I ever heard of. It was the act of a coward, and I am glad to
know that it was not the act of an American.
I hope the time will come, when these malcontents, who are and always
have been, a source of trouble in their own country, will be excluded from our
shores. Foreigners who are men and not
anarchists will ever be welcomed to our shores, but those who merely come here
to stir up strife and enmity, who are not in sympathy with our institutions, I
hope will be excluded.”
Ransom would not stay especially long in the 72nd
Street house. When the Bishop of the Methodist Episcopal
Church of New York, E. G. Andrews, retired in 1904, his place was taken by
Charles Henry Fowler of Buffalo. In
October a “large gathering of Methodist ministers from this city and its
vicinity,” according to the New-York Tribune, met to “pay tribute to the
character of Bishop Andrews and to extend a cordial welcome to Bishop Fowler.”
Bishop Fowler as he appeared when he moved into the 72nd Street house -- the New-York Tribune, October 1, 1904 (copyright expired) |
The 67-year old minister moved in to No. 338 West 72nd
Street with his wife, Myra, and son, Carl Hitchcock Fowler. By now his impressive career included
President of Northwestern University for four years; and editor of the
Christian Advocate. He was elected
General Missionary Secretary of the Church in 1880, and in 1884 elected a
Bishop.
The congregants of wealthy churches in Manhattan abandoned
the city in the summer months for resorts and country estates. With no one to preach to, the churches were
closed and the clergy, like their flock, headed out of town.
As Fowler’s first summer in New York approached, he took his
wife and son away. In their absence a “row
over a carriage” ensued. On August 18,
1905 The Evening World noted that Bishop Charles H. Fowler “is out of the city
for the summer. But because his carriage
is here, two rival livery-men were to-day in the West Side Court.”
Robert S. King managed the stable at No. 247 West 69th
Street, almost directly opposite Charles Grain’s stable at No. 258. Bishop Fowler had been keeping his carriage
in Grain’s stable; but before leaving for the summer gave King written
permission to transfer the vehicle to his stable.
Charles Grain refused to relinquish the carriage. Now, as summer drew to an end, the men argued
their cases before a judge.
“King produced the order [from Fowler] in court. Grain said he was not familiar with the
Bishop's signature,” reported The World.
Robert King told the judge, “He’s jealous, that’s all.”
The judge had little patience for the men’s bickering. “Magistrate
Mayo advised Grain to turn the carriage over to King and dismissed the case.”
In November 1906 the 72nd Street house would be
the scene of an undercover wedding. The Rev. D. John Wesley Hill, pastor of the
2,000-member Janes Methodist Episcopal Church in the Stuyvesant Heights section
of Brooklyn, had been widowed for about three years. A romance developed between him and a member
of the congregation, Mrs. Theodore Schmidt, who had also lost her spouse.
Everyone was aware that the couple intended to marry—but they
were secretive about their exact plans.
One of Dr. Hill’s friends explained:
“Some of Mrs. Schmidt’s friends were determined that there
should be slippers and rice and white ribbons and other old fashioned
accessories to her wedding, and they have been lying awake nights to find out
the day and hour. Dr. Hill and his bride
did not wish to be honored with thrown slippers and rice.”
In order to have a quiet, understated wedding, following Dr.
Hill’s sermon on the evening of November 18, 1906, he and his intended bride
slipped off to Manhattan. “Dr. Hill was
married to Mrs. Schmidt last night at about 10:30 o’clock at the home of Bishop
Charles H. Fower,” reported the New-York Tribune. “Only the immediate relatives of the bride
and Dr. Hill were present.”
The newspaper said that the pastor “gave his parishioners a
mild surprise last night by getting married ahead of the expected time, and
starting on his wedding tour without letting any save his intimate friends know
anything about it.”
Hill’s friend explained to a reporter “They knew that the
plan of some of their friends would be carried out at all hazards, and so they
thought it would be best to be quietly married to-night, after the regular
church service. Their strategy was too
deep for the women who intended to give them an old-fashioned send-off.”
Not long after the surreptitious wedding ceremony, Bishop
Fowler’s health began to deteriorate. Then, in March 1907 he suffered what The New
York Times described as “a slight stroke of paralysis.” Although he largely recovered, a series of
kidney ailments followed. On March 20,
1908 he died in the 72nd Street house of “heart disease complicated
with kidney trouble.”
Four days later the Missouri newspaper, the Sedalia Weekly, reported
“At one o’clock on Monday, March 23, a brief service of prayer for the family
and a few intimate friends was held at the
bishop’s late residence, 338 West Seventy-second Street.”
Fowler’s casket was then removed to the Madison Avenue
Church which, according to the newspaper, “was thronged.” “The casket was covered with black cloth,
with heavy mountings of silver, and upon it were a massive cross of violets and
a great wreath of callas.”
The wreath had been sent by President Theodore Roosevelt.
Mrya Fowler continued to live on in the house, along with
her attorney son Carl. About two months
following his father’s death, Carl began gathering material for his
biography. The Christian Advocate, on
May 14, 1908 noted “He would like to hear from persons possessing especially
interesting letters from Bishop Fowler, from any who have been especially
helped by his acts or influence, and from persons who can communicate incidents
illustrative of his character and work.”
Almost exactly a decade later, at 11:00 on the morning of
Saturday, March 9, 1918, Myra Hitchcock Fowler’s funeral was held in No. 338
West 72nd Street. Carl
inherited his mother’s entire estate, valued at a little over $104,000—about $1.6
million today.
In addition to his legal profession, Carl served the
Methodist church. For over two decades
he was president of the board of trustees of Christ Methodist Church (formerly
the Madison Avenue Methodist Church); was secretary of the board of the John
Street Methodist Church; and president of the Laymen’s Association of the New
York Conference.
Carl Hitchcock Fowler would live in the 72nd
Street house with his wife, Henrietta, until his death on March 30, 1942 at the
age of 68. He died following a leg
amputation necessitated by arteriosclerosis.
Fowler’s death signaled the end of the line for No. 338 West
72nd Street as a private home.
But the family’s many years here
had saved it—now the last remaining rowhouse on the block. It was
sold to Clara Stark, who resold it in 1945 to Mrs. Lola Fink Berger “in a cash
transaction.” The new owner converted it
to apartments—one on each floor except the fourth, which had two.
Among the tenants here was Paola Novikova, a Russian-born
soprano, and her husband Werner Singer, a concert accompanist. Born outside of Moscow in 1896, she studied
music in Germany and Italy. When she
debuted in New York in April 1943, she was critically acclaimed. “Mme. Novikova sings with elegance, taste and
subtlety,” opined one critic.
But Novikova was best known as a voice teacher. On May 6, 1950 The New York Times reported “A
three-year scholarship is offered by Paola Novikova for American singers. Initial auditions will be held at her studio,
338 West Seventy-second Street, May 20.”
The Russian diva taught her students that singing came from
knowing how to breathe. “My idea of
singing is that we are a wind instrument.
To know how to sing, one must know where the resonators are and when
they have to be used.”
Dedicated to her pupil’s development, the small red-haired
instructor made it a point to attend every performance. She confessed that while she may appear
serene in the audience, “she breathed along” with each performing student.
Baritone George London later recalled studying for the
bass-baritone title role in Boris
Godunov.” Paola Novikova would not
allow him to sing a single note before he had learned the meaning and
pronunciation of every Russian word in the Pushkin drama on which the opera was
based.
In August 1967, the nationally-recognized opera coach died
in the West 72nd Street house.
Also in the house was artist, author and art teacher Raphael
Ellender. His works had been exhibited
at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Corcoran Gallery, and National Academy
of Deisgn, the Pennsylvania Academy, the Brooklyn Museum, and the Chicago Art
Institute among other esteemed venues.
Ellender was also an instructor in drawing and painting at New York
University, the Art Students League and New York Community College. He died in August 1972, while still living
here.
Some details, like this oak mantel and the fold-in shutters, survive -- photo blocksy.com |
The façade of the distinguished residence received some
well-deserved attention in 2014.
Squeezed in by the 20th century apartment buildings that
replaced its Victorian neighbors, No. 338 is the last sliver of the 19th
century on the block.
photographs by the author
photographs by the author
Being English I would like to know why the basement of the house was referred to as an English basement. Thank you. Very interesting article.
ReplyDeleteThe term is strictly an Americanism and appeared first in the 1850s. It refers to the lower level of the house below street level; whereas an "American basement" was entered directly from the sidewalk. English basement houses had stoops that led to the parlor floor; American basement homes did not. The origin of the term "English" basement has been lost.
DeleteI am Carl Harkness Fowler, the great grandson of Bishop Fowler. I wanted to thank yoou for this eloquent and well-researched history of what was our family home in New York. I can provide a bit more information to close the Fowler family part of the srtory. I made a street-side visit to the house last Monday and was very pleased to see how well maintained and loved the house appears, while surrounded by such huge adjacent buildings.
ReplyDeleteMy father, Carl Henry Fowler, and my grandmother, Henrietta Rowland Brown Fowler, jointly made the reluctant decision to sell the house in 1942, mostly to get grandmother to a single floor apartment. She was developing walking difficulties and could no longer handle the multi-story layout at 338 72nd Street.
For the next 6 years the family lived in a first floor apartment further north on Riverside Drive at I believe about 110th, then after the great blizzared of 1947/48 they moved to what had been until then an investment property, a home in East Orange, NJ.
My father installed an elevator there for grandmother. Ironically the initial elevator was poorly designed and dropped three floors on its first trip, breaking my father's leg and further crippling grandmother. The elevator was immediately replaced by an Otis Elevator.
But in 1953 the Garden State Parkway was cut through the center of town only a block away and the family moved to a lovely Dutch colonial in Glen Rock, NJ at 39 Birchwood Road. Grandmother died there in 1957. My father passed away in Florida in October of 1976.
I live today in Williston, Vermont and my career was, like my father's, in the travel industry. Dad was a travel agent for the AAA for most of his career. I ran a rail tour company for 33 years which operated tours by train worldwide under the names Rail Travel Center and Rail Travel Adventures. I retired last year.
All of the Fowlers in your article are now buried at the George Washington Memorial Park in Paramus, NJ. Dad moved the Bishop, his family and grandfather Carl Hitchcock Fowler there from the original Fowler mauseleum in the Bronx about 1958, as he loved the park-like setting.
Thank you for the wonderful additional details about your family.
DeleteTom: Your site is fascinating. Thanks for the effort. Let me share one last Fowler family story.
ReplyDeleteAcross the street is a lovely statue of Eleanor Roosevelt. I wonder if her city apartment was nearby? In terms of my grandfather (and namesake) Carl H. Fowler this is a bit ironic. The Fowler family of the early 20th century was arch Republican, and used to call FDR “that man”!
But my dad met Eleanor while he was studying library science at the State College (now SUNY) at New Paltz about 1960. She spent an entire day with the mostly adult students, because she cared so much about adult education. Mom came along that day for obvious reasons.
Both mom and dad were blown away by her charisma and kindness. I remember that evening dad said he’d met a saint. It must have been a true spiritual and converting moment, because he was a good Democrat for the rest of his life! Mom had gone over earlier to the Democratic side. I wonder what the Bishop and/or grandfather would have thought of the close proximity to a memorial for Mrs. Roosevelt? It is a very beautiful statue. In particular I was struck by the lifelike turn of the leg and shoes. Really lifelike.