By the last decades of the 19th century several
prolific New York City architects realized that profits could be substantially
increased by cutting out the middle man.
Architects like Charles True and Charles Buek established their own real
estate development firms. Joining them
in the trend was Richard W. Buckley who, with Robert McCafferty, formed McCafferty
& Buckley in 1880.
The men turned their attention to the developing Upper East
Side where upscale residences were being constructed. The New York Times would
later say “McCafferty & Buckley produced many of the handsomest private
dwellings on the east side of the city.”
Among those handsome private dwellings was the row of four residences at
Nos. 10 through 16 East 77th Street.
Construction began in 1895 and was completed the following year. Buckley’s 25-foot wide neo-Renaissance style
homes were clad in brick and brownstone Like its neighbors, the English basement and parlor levels of No. 14 were faced in planar stone while
the carroty-colored brick of the upper floors avoided visual heaviness. A high brownstone
stoop led to the doorway, framed in foliate carving and crowned by engaged colonnettes
and an elaborately carved panel with a blank shield.
An unexpectedly sympathetic renovation in 1945 transformed the doorway into a window. |
It would be two years before No. 14 found a buyer. But on June 25, 1898 The New York Times
reported that McCafferty & Buckley had sold it to George T. Maxwell for “about
$90,000.” It was a significant price,
equal to about $2.65 million today.
George Thebaud Maxwell was the principal in the firm of Maxwell &
Co. at No. 32 Broadway. The 30-year old
broker and his wife, the former Marie Raymond, had two sons, George Lascelles and
Charles Raymond.
The Maxwells not only decorated the mansion with antique furniture and
costly artwork; but George filled it with his prized collection of medieval
armor. The Princeton Alumni Weekly
called it “one of the finest private collections in this country.”
Not having a daughter did not prevent Marie from hosting debutante and
bridal entertainments. In November 1903
she gave a reception followed by a dinner and dance for Alexandra H.
Stevens. Before Justine Ingersoll
married Dr. Harold Sears Arnold in Grace Church in October 1913, Marie gave “a
dansant for the bridal party and some of their friends.” And two years later she hosted a dance in the
house for debutante Marie Tailer.
Maintaining an upscale home with two boys required a full domestic
staff. In 1906 Marie was in search of a
new housekeeper. She was precise regarding the
woman she was looking for; one requirement being that she was unmarried. Her advertisement on February 13 specified “Refined
German lady; widower or bachelor; likes children; highest references.”
When Marie Maxwell’s father, Colonel Charles H. Raymond, died in his
Morristown, New Jersey home in September 1916, his funeral was held in the 77th
Street house. He had earned his rank in
the Civil War and was prominent in the insurance business.
Like other moneyed New York families, the Maxwells' city home was used mainly during the winter season. They maintained a
country estate, Wake Robin, at Oyster Bay, Long Island. The New York Times called it “one of the show
places of the section.” They also maintained a
home in Pau, France and spent much of each year abroad.
Both sons were schooled in Europe; but as their educations came to an
end they returned to No. 14 East 77th Street. It may have been this sudden need for
additional space that prompted the Maxwells to hire architect John H. Duncan to
design an additional floor in the spring of 1920. Surprisingly, Duncan gave little effort to
melding the $30,000 addition with the original structure—neither in materials
or design.
As the family traveled to France each year, Marie helped the
staff who did not accompany them to find temporary employment. In 1921, for instance, she placed an
advertisement that read “Lady going abroad this week wishes to place her cook,
laundress, maid, chambermaid, kitchenmaid.”
Marie Maxwell’s interests were rarely political; but
Prohibition changed that. On August 24,
1922 she hosted a luncheon at Wake Robin for the Molly Pitcher Club. A branch of the Association Against the
Prohibition Amendment, its socialite members resolved that afternoon to “check
any tendency on the part of our national Government to regulate the personal
habits of the American people except those habits which may be designated as
criminal.”
By now the Maxwell boys were young adults. Before long both would cause headaches to
their parents and bring unwanted press to the family’s name.
In 1924 Charles was working in his father’s office as a
clerk, earning $25 a week. A Fifth Avenue
dressmaker, Nanine Simpson Breval, caught his eye. Charles began seeing the slightly older woman
and on October 21 they secretly married.
Marie Maxwell was in Europe and blissfully unaware that her son had
moved out of the 77th Street house and into an apartment at No. 64
East 86th Street with his bride.
The news leaked out and a month later, on November 24,
Charles was back in the family house, telling reporters there was no truth in
the rumors. But The New York Times
reported “A friend of the family said yesterday that if Mr. Maxwell had married
Miss Breval he was trying to keep it a secret because he did not wish to alarm
his mother, who is in Europe.”
In fact, Charles had been ordered back to 77th
Street by his father. And all attempts to hide the
scandal from Marie were soon pointless.
Nanine sued Charles for desertion and won $100 a week alimony and $1,500
counsel fees. Charles’s attorneys
protested the large amount (about $1,350 a week in 2016), saying it was four
times the young man’s salary. Nanine’s
lawyers countered, pointing out that he had an $80,000 trust fund.
Having won her case, the humiliated and enraged “former
Fifth Avenue modiste” now went after George T. Maxwell. On September 28, 1925 she sued him for
$250,000 in damages. She maintained that
she “was living happily with [Charles] as his wedded wife, and as such was
cherished and loved by him and was enjoying his comfort, support, protection
and consort.” But then, her complaint
said, George “maliciously enticed and induced his son to desert and abandon”
her, leaving her “without support of protection.”
The story had a tragic ending when Charles Raymond Maxwell
was killed 10 months later, on July 13, 1926, in an automobile accident near
Nantes, France.
In the spring of 1929, at the age of 61, George T. Maxwell contracted pneumonia. He died in the 77th
Street house on April 6.
On August 22, 1932 son George married Katherine Thraves. The newlyweds seemed to lead model lives of wealthy
couples. Marie had transferred title of
the 77th Street house, now valued at $118,000, to George, and the
couple owned a 13-acre estate called “Oakleigh” in Virginia. On March 15, 1933 The New York Times reported
“Mr. and Mrs. George Lascelles Maxwell, who are returning from Paris, will give
a reception on the afternoon of March 23 at 14 East Seventy-seventy street.” All seemed perfect in the Maxwell household.
But it was not.
Katherine was pregnant at the time. That summer she and George went to Virginia
where she lived in terror. George,
according to testimonies later, was addicted to alcohol and drugs. He was verbally and physically abusive and
continually humiliated Katherine in public with profane outbursts.
On November 5, 1933, due to a kidney condition which caused
her to be bedridden, Katherine moved back to No. 14 East 77th Street
with George. Full-time nurses were
hired, yet George “on many occasions treated [Katherine] with inconsiderate
physical cruelty, thereby inuring her health, and endangering the health of her
unborn child,” according to court documents later.
Katherine was removed to a hospital on November 5. George continually interfered and at one
point was so deranged with drugs and liquor that he had to be admitted
himself. The baby was born on December
30, 1933; and Katherine’s condition continued to be so precarious that it was doubtful
she would survive through January.
Court papers said that George “repeatedly frightened and
annoyed [Katherine] by appearing before her in an abnormal, intoxicated or drugged
condition,” and interfered with the nurses.
When she was strong enough, Katherine fled the 77th Street
mansion on March 5, 1934 and filed for separation.
George’s attorneys claimed she “willfully deserted and
abandoned her husband.”
George’s mother had remarried and her husband, Colonel
Dorsey Cullen, died on March 7, 1938.
She and her son liquidated the contents of the 77th Street
house in preparation for its sale. On
January 22, 1939 The Times noted that the upcoming auction would include 18th
century French furniture, English and French silver, Russian enamels, and
artworks.
“The collection contains a number of pieces of French
furniture by maitres ebenistes,” said the article. “English silver of the sixteenth-eighteenth
centuries includes an Elizabethan communion chalice and cover and a James I
communion cup. A small group of French
silver includes a chiseled flagon by Jean-Baptiste Claude Odiot. Russian enamels and silver include pieces by
court goldsmiths Carl Faberge, A. Thielmann and Adler.”
The two-day auction took in $66,002. Among the highest prices were paid for a
Louis XVI bureau “understood to have been presented by Marie Antoinette to the
Princess de Lamballe,” which brought $1,300; and a Louis XV piece by Adrien
Faizelot Delorme which sold for $1,500.
The demand for vast Victorian private homes in the 1940s
was, essentially, nil. In 1945 Mrs. E.
L. During began transforming old houses into apartments. The New York Times wrote on October 14 that
year “Mrs. During specialized in refurbishing old houses.” Her renovations to No. 14 included removing
the stoop and lowering the entrance to the former basement level, changing the
original doorway into a window, and creating 12 apartments.
The most celebrated of the tenants here would be Woody
Allen, who moved in during the summer of 1962.
Despite the 1945 alterations and the 1920 rooftop addition;
the house retains its architecturally interesting and dignified appearance,
offering little hint of the sometimes scandalous lives that played out inside.
photographs by the author
This is a wonderful article. I was doing some genealogy research on my second cousin (whose surname is my middle name) and I came upon this hugely informative, well written article. Thank you so much for writing it. I would be interested in finding out what your sources were as that would be genealogical proof for my research. susanbschumaker@outlook.com
ReplyDelete