In 1924, just months before its demolition, the Asylum building was virtually unchanged since 1831 -- NYPL Collection |
To the early Victorian mind, the blind were to be pitied. Without sight, it was most often felt that a person
could not be educated nor could significantly contribute to society. The New York City fathers of 1831, however,
were surprisingly forward-thinking.
Three years earlier the City had spent $32,500 for James
Blackwell’s island in the East River and laid plans for a smallpox hospital, an
insane asylum, a debtors house and a prison.
James Renwick, Jr. would receive the commissions for these
structures. The isolated location would
assure that the dangerous or undesirable inmates were at a comfortable distance from
the general population.
Apparently the blind were considered less threatening. The block of land stretching from Ninth to
Eighth Avenues, between 33rd and 34th Streets, was acquired
and in 1831 the New York Asylum for the Blind was completed. In the undeveloped area north of the city,
the residents and pupils would enjoy the refreshing open air and sunshine. The
structure filled the Ninth Avenue blockfront, while behind a grassy expanse
provided park-like grounds.
The name of the architect of the great granite structure is
lost; however his design bears compelling similarities to some of the features
of Renwick’s Blackwell Island facilities.
The mass of the neo-Gothic structure was divided into five nearly-equal
parts—two projecting end pavilions with high mansard roofs that sat slightly
higher than their adjoining wings; a central section with turrets, an open bell
tower and imposing Gothic window at the fourth floor; and two connecting
wings. Square-headed Gothic eyebrows
capped the windows of the first three floors, giving the building a romantic,
English feel.
The New York Asylum for the Blind was funded by donations
from citizens; the bulk coming from the wealthy. Its was not meat to be a purely charitable institution, but to educate the blind and ready them
for “the active duties and business pursuits of life.” Students could stay until they reached
21-years of age and were schooled in academics, music, and “manufactures” (the making of
baskets, mattresses, sewing, etc.).
Still, visitors to the facility would for decades record
their experiences in sappy Victorian prose which balanced their positive
impressions of the school’s achievements with sentimental pity. In 1841 the editor of The Knickerbocker wrote
of his visit. “Who that has ever heard
Braham sing ‘Sampson’s Lament for the loss of Sight,’ can ever forget the
emotions which filled his mind, when the passage, so effectively rendered, ‘ No
sun, no moon, no stars—all dark!’ falls full on the ear?”
This was the impression, he said, upon entering the Asylum. But he went on to mention “the interesting
processes of reading and ciphering, by means of raised letters and moveable
numerals; the exquisite musical performances, in full instrumental bank, by the
male pupils, and the excellent vocal efforts of the females; together with the
ingenious manufactures, of various kinds, which enliven the manual department,
and cheer the hearts of the willing laborers.”
The students were less emotional about their disability than
was the outside world. Annually the institution
staged exhibitions during which musical programs were performed, students displayed
their academic prowess, and manufactured items were shown and sold. In 1839 19-year old Frances J. Crosby, a new
student, recited her poem to the audience that included the lines:
But why, ah! Why the falling tear?
Why heaves the sad, unbidden sigh?
The lamp of knowledge, bright and fair,
Pours luster on our mental eye
She wrote her first poem at the age of eight, and like the
one she read to the Asylum audience, it reflected her resolve to transcend her blindness:
Oh, what a happy soul am I!
Although I cannot see.
I am resolved in this world
Contented I will be.
That other people don’t;
To weep and sigh because I’m blind,
I cannot and I won’t”
In 1852 there were 120 students in the school. The exhibition that year, as always, not only
showed the general public the abilities of the blind; but gave the sponsors the
assurance that their money was being well spent. In addition to the large musical program
that year, The Times reported on “The usual exercises in Reading, Geography,
Grammar, Astronomy and Arithmetic, exhibited the proficiency of the pupils in
the acquisition of ordinary knowledge.
Several specimens of the handiwork of blind artisans, baskets, mats,
mattresses, hampers, etc., were on the stage for exhibition.”
Two years later The Journal of the Senate of the State of
New York said of the school, “It not only affords instruction to pupils, but by
the employment which it gives in its workshops supports a large number of blind
persons, some of whom have families dependant on them.”
But The New York Times that year was scathing in its assessment
of the Asylum’s management. On July 14,
1854 the reporter began with a florid description of the musical performance of
the night before.
“Nature—good kind mother Nature—provides a balm for all
wounds, and her stricken children ever find solace at her bosom; whatever may
be taken away, there is always one sense left, which by cultivation will afford
the keenest enjoyment. Music is a special
gift to the blind; they excel in it. For
the simple reason that it is the only sensual enjoyment permitted them. How wonderful their delicacy of touch! How quick
their perception of sound!”
But the newspaper quickly turned its searing attention to the
management. “The New-York Asylum for the
blind is redeemed from utter insufficiency only so far as its musical
arrangements are concerned…Neglect, slovenliness and bad management are visible
in every part of the establishment.
Among the officials, petty jealousies and feuds are of constant
recurrence. It appears to be no one’s
duty to do anything but take his pay, and even this in some instances is
performed with a lofty condescension that repels all idea of a quid pro quo.
“Externally, the Institute looks as if it were in chancery;
internally, it is cheerless, with burlish men prowling about—blessed with
eyesight, but incapable of seeing anything but their own interests.”
The article went on for paragraphs pummeling the management
with insults. It then returned to the
music. “We have seldom spent a more agreeable
afternoon than that in the Chapel of the Blind Asylum. The pupils appeared to be thoroughly animated
with the pure pleasure that mere performance of the music afforded them. We were assured that no classes of pupils are
more happy and joyous than those of the Institute.”
The following day four instructors, including Frances
Crosby, issued a letter to the editor rebutting the “personal abuse lavished on
Mr. Cooper, the Superintendant,” saying “we are at a loss to account for a
criticism so obviously erroneous as the statements of your correspondent.”
It was around this time that a young, sighted man from New
Jersey was given a job as a bookkeeper.
Grover Cleveland worked here for a year before heading to Ohio and,
later, to the White House as 22nd President of the United States.
A stereopticon view shows the Asylum around the time of the Civil War -- NYPL Collection |
In February 1864 the Asylum was embarrassed when a group of
pupils sent a complaint to the State Legislature alleging “severity in the
discipline of the institution, etc.” By
now The New York Times had changed its assessment of the school’s supervision
and wrote “The management of this, which is one of the oldest and most useful
of our charitable institutions, is in the hands of some of our most excellent
and most highly esteemed citizens, who give to it a great deal of their time
and personal attention. They allege that
these complaints emanate from a few of the pupils, who have been necessarily
restrained in the indulgence of vicious propensities, and who have taken this
method of revenging themselves.”
A state committee was appointed to investigate the charges
which the newspaper deemed “one-sided.”
The annual exhibition of 1881 not only provided the expected
musical performances, but demonstrated a few of the newer teaching
methods. In the area of Geography, for
example, three pupils “created great interest, the boys pointing out portions
of countries, rivers, mountains, etc., on the map prepared for them entirely by
the sense of feeling,” reported The Times.
“A ‘dissected map,’ consisting of a number of blocks of wood joined together—somewhat
in the nature of a puzzle—was taken apart by a blind teacher, Mr. Stephen A.
Babcock, and was put together again perfectly by three little blind girls.”
In 1903 discussions for a new location were on the
table. The massive Pennsylvania Station project encompassing
the blocks between 31st and 33rd Streets, diagonally across
Eighth Avenue from the school property, was being developed and “the holdings
of the institution…have been the subject of much inquiry on the part of real
estate brokers,” reported a local newspaper.
Besides, the city had engulfed the Asylum property, creating distraction to learning. “With trolleys on three sides and an elevated
across the front, it has become increasingly difficult to talk against the roar
of traffic, and a great deal of the teaching has to be done orally,” explained The Times.
It would be years, however, before the Asylum’s plans were
finalized.
The 9th Avenue Elevated train ran in front of the building -- NYPL Collection |
A frail, orphaned girl who studied here for fourteen years,
Margaret Hogan, made an impression in 1907 when she entered Barnard
College. At a time when even few
sighted women attended higher education, the challenges for her were
significant. A "reader" read the textbook
chapters to Margaret, who took notes on her typewriter. The typewritten pages were then sent to a
printer for the blind, who translated them to Braille.
Although Margaret was the first student from the Asylum to
apply for college entrance, the teachers there confirmed that “quite a
number” of their pupils were “sufficiently prepared to take up a college course.” The Times said at the time that the Asylum’s courses
were “quite equal, if not superior, to those of the city high schools along
this line.”
In 1909 the school purchased the 50-acre Dewitt estate in exclusive
Bronxville, New York near Lawrence Park where it planned a new campus. Before long, however, there was an uprising
among the wealthy residents. At a public
hearing one called the Asylum for the Blind so “undesirable as to be
characterized as a nuisance." Another
said that “an institution had ruined Sing Sing, and an institution had ruined
Matteawan and should another institution be allowed to ruin Lawrence Park?”
The institutions to which the speaker referred were New York
State’s Sing Sing Correctional Facility and the Matteawan State Hospital for
the Criminally Insane. The New York
Times pointed out that the speaker was “Thereby, by insinuation, classing the students of a
school for the blind with the criminals at Sing Sing and the criminally insane
at Matteawan.”
One brave resident voiced his opposition to the mob. “I consider this thing not only un-Christian,
but positively heathenish. What possible
harm a fine school located in a fifty-acre lot could do is more than I can
see. I guess some of the Bronxsville
women are afraid it might give them something to think about besides bridge
whist.”
The school reversed its plans and sold the property in
January 1910.
Proposed deals for the 9th Avenue property came
and went over the next decade until finally in August 1923 it was sold for more
than $1 million. The Asylum, which now
went by the more politically-correct name of the New York Institute for the
Education of the Blind, had purchased land on Pelham Parkway in the Bronx. The Times reported that “The institute will
continue its work in the building until Sept. 1, 1924, when it will move to its
new home.”
In February 1925 the venerable Asylum Building, just six
years short of a century old, was demolished.
Today, on the site of the great brooding Gothic structure, stands a
four-story retail and residential-use building reminiscent of a suburban strip
mall.
photo by Dmadeo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bhphotovideo.JPG |
this site will be an awesome reliquary for peoples from all backgrounds. im always amazed at the finds
ReplyDeleteThanks! It's especially fun to resurrect long forgotten landmarks like this one
ReplyDeleteIf you'd every want a tour of the school as it survives today on Pelham Parkway. look me up. I've worked there since 1976.
ReplyDelete