Not to be overlooked among the arbiters of Manhattan society
in the 19th century was Nathalie Elizabeth Ray Baylies. While some women—Caroline Astor, Mamie Fish
and Alice Vanderbilt, for example—were more apparent in the press; only a few claimed the pedigree
of Mrs. N. E. Baylies.
On November 27, 1856 she had married Edmund Lincoln Baylies,
a graduate of Harvard University and wealthy merchant. The New York Times later wrote “With her
marriage to Mr. Baylies two of the oldest families in America were united, the
Baylies family having come from Worcestershire, England and settled in
Massachusetts in 1737.” On Nathalie’s
side, the Ray family included Cornelius Ray, President of the first United
States bank in New York City.
Among the couple’s ancestors were Colonel Hodijay Baylies,
aide de camp to George Washington, and his wife Elizabeth Lincoln. “One branch produced President Abraham
Lincoln and the other Levi Lincoln, the Massachusetts Revolutionary patriot,
and his equally illustrious son, Governor Levi Lincoln of Massachusetts,” said
The Times.
Edmund Lincoln Baylies died in Geneva, Switzerland on
November 28, 1869. The 32-year old widow
pressed on, rearing the children and passing the summers more often at the Baylies
estate, Kippanwoods, in Taunton, Massachusetts, than in Newport or other
expected resorts.
Like all moneyed families before and just following the
Revolutionary War, the Rays had maintained a country estate north of the city. The 40-acre Ray Farm was near the village of
Chelsea and its mansion sat approximately where Ninth Avenue and West 28th
Street would be laid out. When the great
house burned in the 1840s, Nathalie’s father rebuilt it; even though by now the
city had closed in.
Robert Ray died in 1879 and Nathalie not only inherited the
Gothic Revival mansion, but moved in.
Although the original house was a summer escape; this one was “built on
the old-fashioned ideas of comfort,” according to The Sun. But despite the ballroom, the Gothic library
with “room on the shelves for several thousand volumes" and its stained glass
window, and the doorways that “rise to a point at the centre like cathedral
arches,” Nathalie joined the northward movement of millionaires as the last
decade of the century arrived.
On Christmas Eve 1893 The Sun reported that the house was to
be demolished. “Mrs. Baylies occupied
the house until May last, when she decided to move up town, and she is now
building a house at Fifth avenue and Seventy-first street,” reported the
newspaper.
The neighborhood was a hive of development. James Lenox had built his fabulous Lenox
Library on his family’s “farm” in 1877 encompassing the entire block
between 70th and 71st Streets on the Avenue. Following his death in 1880 the Lenox Hill
land was sold off and mansions began lining the blocks.
In February 1892 Nathalie Baylies purchased her large
building plot from John N. Golding. She
chose the newly-founded architectural firm of Boring, Tilton & Mellen to
design the mansion. Edward Tilton
and William A. Boring had formed their firm the previous year and by now Nathan
C. Mellen had joined them. The Baylies residence would be among the firm’s few New York City commissions.
In May 1892 plans were filed for a “five-story brick and
stone dwelling.” The dwelling was
originally estimated to cost $80,000—or about $2 million in today’s
dollars. It would end up costing Nathalie Baylies
much more not only in money and time, but in fury.
The Baylies mansion would face the Lenox Library,
taking the address No. 1 East 71st Street. Generally Renaissance Revival in style, the
architects designed a 113-foot long structure, despite the building plot being
just 100 feet long. The extra length
resulted from their adding dimension to the otherwise flat-faced palazzo in the form
of three bulging bays—two on East 71st Street and one on the Avenue
elevation. The bays extended beyond the
actual property line.
Stepping over the property line seemed to be no major
problem. The New York Times explained “In
order to make the construction permissible, it was necessary that consents
should be obtained from the Department of Parks and from the owners of adjacent
property.”
The Department of Parks voted in favor and the property
owner on the 71st Street side “cheerfully” gave his consent. “Plans for the avenue bay window were
accordingly made,” said The Times on July 3, 1892, since “They never dreamed of
trouble in getting the consent of the adjoining avenue owner.”
The “adjoining avenue owner” was Mrs Thomas E.
Sattherthwaite. And, indeed, she did
give trouble. In fact, she obstinately
refused; despite the fact that her property was a vacant lot. The problem for Nathalie Baylies was that construction of her
mansion was already well under way.
The New York Times told its readers about the “ill feeling”
welling up. “When Mrs. N. A. Baylies
moves into her new house at the northeast corner of Fifth Avenue and
Seventy-first Street, opposite the Lenox Library, she will not entertain the
kindliest feelings toward Mrs. Thomas E. Satterthwaite, the owner of the
adjacent avenue lot. The house will have
cost Mrs. Baylies several thousand dollars above the estimates, and it will probably
be hard to convince her that any one was at fault for the extra cost except
Mrs. Satterthwaite.”
Construction of the first story of the mansion was nearly
completed when “the architects found they had counted without their host.” Isabella Satterthwaite, for whatever reason,
refused to budge. The Times reported “Argument and pleading could not move
her. The fact that the majority of
houses along the Park front swell out beyond the building line and that
adjacent owners have for years consented to it as a matter of course had no
effect upon her. She was proof alike
against persuasion and entreaty.”
Now, because of her objections, the Park Commissioners were
forced to withdraw the permit for the Avenue bay. One can only imagine the infuriated pearl-swagged
Nathalie Baylies as the drama played out.
“The removal of the swell front would necessitate some
change of plans,” noted The Times, “the destruction of some costly work, and
rebuilding.” And that is exactly what
finally happened. Although the bowed three-story
limestone base remained, it had to be pulled back from the sidewalk;
significantly reducing the interior square footage.
The dowager socialite moved into her massive home and began
the routine of winter entertainments and summer seasons away. Nevertheless, it appears she did not feel
constricted by the regimented schedule of society. The New-York Tribune made mention on
September 30, 1902 that “Mrs. N. E. Baylies is at her country place,
Kippanwoods, at Taunton, Mass., and will not return to town and open her house
at Fifth-ave. and Seventy-first-st. until quite late in the fall.”
Despite her advancing age, Nathalie’s home was the scene of
repeated entertainments. On February 17,
1903 The Times reported “Mrs. N. E. Baylies will give a musicale this evening
in her residence, at 1 East Seventy-first Street” and added “Mrs. Baylies has
been entertaining a great deal this Winter.
She gave a large reception last week.”
Nathalie Baylies anticipated a new neighbor in February 1912
when Cornelius Vanderbilt announced his plans to build a new mansion on Fifth
Avenue between 71st and 72nd Street. His would adjoin the sumptuous James A.
Burden residence at the opposite corner from the Baylies mansion. That would leave only the lot next door--the one which
had caused Nathalie so much trouble--still undeveloped.
By now steel tycoon Henry C. Frick had purchased the entire
blockfront where the Lenox Library stood, anticipating the erection of a
gargantuan mansion. Nathalie Baylies,
however, would not see the completion of either Vanderbilt’s nor Frick’s new
homes.
On December 9, 1912 the 75-year old socialite died of heart
disease. The grand home she had built
less than two decades earlier would not stand many years longer. It was replaced in 1928 by the
equally-impressive mansion of Florence Vanderbilt Twombly, granddaughter of
Cornelius Vanderbilt and the widow of Hamilton McKown Twombly.
Following Mrs. Twombly’s death in that house in April, 1952,
a modern apartment building was constructed on the site.
photo http://www.cityrealty.com/nyc/park-fifth-ave-79th-st/900-fifth-avenue/4223 |
She was a distant relative of my daughter.
ReplyDelete