The battle for Fifth Avenue between millionaire homeowners
and commercial enterprise was well underway by 1890. Although jewelers, dressmakers and art
dealers were making inroads among the brownstone mansions, it was the grand
hotels that were the largest threat to the residential neighborhood.
As early as 1871, construction began on the block-wide Windsor Hotel between 46th and 47th Streets. Now, in 1890, the doors opened to the new
Plaza Hotel at the northern fringes of Millionaire’s Row, and William Waldorf
Astor demolished his father’s mansion at the northwest corner of 33rd
Street and broke ground for the hulking Waldorf Hotel that same year.
As Astor’s massive hotel designed by Henry J. Hardenberg
rose, the millionaire commissioned William Hume to work on another grand hotel,
diagonally across from the Plaza at the southeast corner of Fifth Avenue and 59th
Street. Hume presented Astor with
designs for an imposing brick and stone structure with remarkable similarities
to Hardenberg’s Waldorf.
A sketch of the coming structure was published in 1893 -- from the collection of the New York Public Library |
The 17-story structure, like the Waldorf, featured
Romanesque arches, turrets and a high mansard crowned with a balustrade. To enable the structure to attain such
heights, Hume used steel framing—one of the first examples of the structural process in the city. The architect incorporated the latest technology of the day to ensure the hotel would be state of the
art. Elevators, plumbing and electricity
would provide guests with the latest in convenience. There would even be a telephone in every room—a
feature that would prompt a newspaper to later comment, “so that the millionaire
who is ill may transact his business in bed.”
As opening day approached, an advertisement boasted that the hotel had “Every
scientific appliance in ventilating, heating, plumbing & Electric Lighting.”
An advertisement promised "The Furnishings of a palace. The table of an Epicure." Club Men of New York, January 1893 (copyright expired) |
On August 3, 1892 Electricity:
A Popular Electrical and Financial Journal remarked that work on the hotel “is rapidly
nearing completion. The work of a
structural nature is about completed, and the decorative, plumbing and
electrical work is being pushed with all speed.
Wiring has commenced, and the work of placing the power plant is at
present receiving attention.”
The hotel would have generate its own power. “A noticeable feature of the electric
installation lies in the fact that no belts are to be used in power transmission;
imported cotton rope will connect the engines, jack-shafts, and dynamos. When completed, this will be the largest
rope-driven electric plant in this or any other country,” said Electricity.
As the hotel neared completion, Astor leased it to Ferdinand
P. Earle who also ran the high-end Hotel Normandie on Broadway. One of Earle’s first challenges concerned the
waiter’s union. To avoid the labor
problems several other hotels were experiencing, he agreed to hire union
waiters. But he put his foot down when
it came to facial hair.
On May 13, 1893, The New York Times reported, “The members of
the International Hotel Employes’ Association were happy yesterday. A report was brought down to their
headquarters at the Chimney Corner that the manager of the New Netherlands
Hotel, which is to be opened on Decoration Day, had decided to employ association
waiters, but on the condition that the men should not insist on wearing
mustaches. The waiters will waive their claim to the right of wearing
mustaches."
If Astor had paid a fortune for the construction of the
hotel, Earle was not far behind in its furnishings. All told, the project cost $3 million—in
the neighborhood of $75 million today.
The interiors were decorated by James T. Hall & Co. of New York.
In a well-conceived publicity ploy, Earle invited three
United States Senators to spend the night in the hotel one day before the
opening. Senators David B. Hill of New York, Charles J.
Faulkner of West Virginia and Fred T. Dubois of Idaho had the cavernous hotel
to themselves “in apartments equally as gorgeous and far more extensive than
those which the Nation’s Spanish guests have been given,” said The New York Times on
June 1, 1893.
“The parlors of the house, with their costly drapings and
upholstery, the immense dining room finished in Mexican onyx, the spacious
halls and corridors, approached by a staircase in carved Numidian marble, and
even the bridal chambers were at their disposal, with none to molest or make
them afraid,” reported the newspaper.
Among the works of art was an immense oil painting by Franklin
Tuttle in the lobby depicting the purchase of Manhattan Island from the Native
Americans. The painting measured 25 by
12 feet and the figures were nearly life sized.
A clerk explained to Senator Dubois that the price paid for the land was
$24. “'There has been a noticeable
increase in the value of that real estate,’ mused the Senator as he moved away
to look at another painting, which represents the refusal of Peter Stuyvesant
to cede Manhattan Island to the English,” said The Times reporter.
The following morning, the senators joined the Senate Committee
on Immigration in the New Netherlands Room.
The New York Times said, “The room is a reproduction of the best finished and
furnished of old Dutch rooms,” and The Decorator and Furnisher added, “This
quaintly beautiful room is deeply imbued with the spirit of the German
Renaissance. The woodwork throughout is
dark antique oak, and the tile decorations a brilliant Dutch blue, a
combination rather strong and starling in its contrasts, but in a room of this
character, perfectly allowable.”
Delft-style tiles covered the upper walls of the New Netherlands Room -- The Decorator and Furnisher, March 1897 (copyright expired) |
But first, there was the matter of formally opening the
hotel. And it would be an astounding
exhibition of electrical technology. At
10:00, with the senators and newspaper men crowded around, Earle’s young son, Guyon
Locke Crocheron Earle, pressed a button.
“This act will start the machinery plant of the house, unfurl a United
States flag on the flagpole, seventeen stories higher, and discharge a cannon
which has been fastened to the roof. The
house will then be declared open for guests,” said The New York Times.
The remarkable hotel made news far outside New York
City. Maine’s The Lewiston Evening Journal
announced on June 1, 1893 “The New Netherland is a magnificent structure, 17
stories high, of dull, yellowish brick, with brownstone trimmings. The entrance is imposing and broad, with
massive carved stone pillars supporting the portico. It is a palace for a king, magnificent in its
appointments, solid and durable as the ages.”
Calling the hotel “elegant, “ the newspaper said, “But the
parlors surpass in beauty and magnificence of furnishing everything in the
hotel. They open directly into the hall
and connect with each other. There is
one that is especially unique and beautiful, and that is the empire room. Their [sic] furniture is upholstered in the
prevailing tints and the magnificent rugs harmonize with the whole.”
The Empire Parlor -- The Decorator and Furnisher, September 1896 (ciopyright expired) |
The Evening Journal described the bridal suite in
detail. “The parlor is a symphony in
cream, pale pink and Nile green. The
ceiling is a stucco work of garlands and roses, rosebuds and delicate
leaves. The walls are upholstered in
Nile green tapestry, with pink and white rosebuds, and the gilt furniture is
covered with satin brocade of the same color.”
The newspaper summed it up saying “There is no evidence in
the hotel that money has been spared.”
In fact, no expense had been spared. Earl purchased the carpeting, draperies, wall
hangings and upholstery from W. & J. Sloane for $74,000. The Phoenix Furniture Company had custom
built the furniture for $180,000. The
silverware was provided by Gorham Manufacturing Company at a cost of $65,000. The combined outlay to these three suppliers
alone would amount to about $8 million today.
The Evening World chimed in, saying that the 370-room New
Netherlands was even finer than the Waldorf.
“Of the series of Astor hotels which have so far been erected in New
York the New Netherlands is, architecturally, the most magnificent. It is, indeed, considered by many persons the
most wonderful hotel structure in the world.”
The day following the opening, The New York Times commented
on the technical advances, including the fire alarm. “As a precaution against fire telemeters are
connected with each room by which, whenever the temperature rises higher than
130 [degrees], the annunciator tells that fact to the office.”
The Times reported on the painted ceilings, the many oil
paintings and tapestries, and the marble, onyx and hardwood trimmings. “The general effect is of substantial
elegance, and a degree of taste has been displayed which leaves no room for
criticism as to over finish.”
The New Netherlands was a residential hotel, intended more for permanent
residents than transient guests. Among
the first to move in were Thomas W. Strong and his wife Lena B. Graves Strong,
according to the 1893 Social Register.
The New-York Daily Tribune noted on Sunday, November 26 that year, “Mrs.
N. S. de L. Wyse will give an afternoon tea to-morrow in her apartments in the
Hotel New Netherlands.”
Ten days earlier, the hotel had been the scene of a
politically and socially-important function.
On Thursday November 16 St. Patrick’s Cathedral was “filled with
distinguished people,” according to The Evening World, as Elizabeth Elkins
married Edwin E. Bruner. Not only did Archbishop
Corrigan participate, but Cardinal Gibbons of Baltimore had traveled to New
York to officiate in the ceremony.
The bridal party, including the maid of honor, Grace Davis,
who was the daughter of Senator Davis of West Virginia, and the Elkins family took
rooms in the New Netherlands Hotel. The
bride’s father was Stephen Benton Elkins, the Secretary of State under
President Harrison.
Following the ceremony, “The wedding party were driven
directly to the New Netherlands Hotel, where there was a wedding breakfast in
the banquet hall, on the parlor floor.
The breakfast was eaten standing.
The guests were 125 in number, and the breakfast was followed by a
reception, the whole of the magnificently appointed parlor floor being given up
to the reception,” said The Evening World.
The socially-important bride would set up housekeeping in the hotel -- The Evening World, November 16, 1893 (copyright expired) |
The newspaper noted “Mr. and Mrs. Bruner will go on a
two-weeks’ wedding journey, and when they return will take up their residence
at the New Netherlands.”
Unfortunately for Ferdinand Earle, his extravagant outlays
for silver, antiques, artwork and furnishings were more than the hotel could
provide for. In March, less than
a year after the opening, Earle was no longer able to pay the rent and, as The
Evening World worded it on April 6, “he was evicted from the palatial New
Netherlands Hotel.”
By the end of June, William Astor had found a new proprietor
in Stafford & Whitaker. The Evening
World announced on June 29, 1894, “A lease for a period of ten years has been
signed, and the work of refurnishing and refitting the big hotel will be begun
very soon.” In reporting on the change
in managers, the newspaper added, “It is one of the most magnificently
appointed houses in the world.”
Stafford told The New York Times, “There are a number of
changes to be made inside. The house is
fully furnished, and if we can make a satisfactory arrangement with Gen. Earle’s
creditors, we will purchase the furnishings, but if we cannot, we will
refurnish it from cellar to roof.” He
added, “We shall continue to run it as a family hotel, and cater for regular
boarders, although we will in no wise refuse transients.”
The magnificent appointments referred to by The Evening
World would invite trouble later that year.
The hotel was decorated with costly objects and works of art—a fact that
was a bit too tempting for some employees.
In September 1894, the manager noticed “that choice bric-a-brac, rare
vases, silver and chinaware were mysteriously disappearing,” reported The New
York Times.
The house detective was put on the case, who discovered within 30 days “several
thousands of dollars’ worth of goods had been stolen,” and eight employees were
under suspicion Two police detectives were called in to help
on the case. “They found that the method
was to throw the valuable booty into the ash carts, and afterward pawn it,”
explained The New York Times on November 27.
Detectives arrested three employees, William Shannon, Allen
J. Curry, and John Rooney, as well as Shannon’s wife, Mary. They were charged with robbing the hotel of
$5,000 worth of goods. “The stolen
property included almost every article of household furniture that could be
used in furnishing a flat in complete style,” said The Times on November
28. “Several truckloads of goods were
removed [from the homes of the employees] and stored in a vacant room in the
New Netherland, where they are practically under control of the Property Clerk
of the Police Department.”
Twenty-nine year old Allen Curry was a watchman with a
salary of $40 a month. His participation
in the ring enabled him to spend $45 a month on rent. “When the premises were searched large
quantities of the finest provisions that money could buy were found,” said The New York Times.
As with any hotel, The New Netherlands had its share of
customer peculiarities. Near the top of
the list of most unusual was Anna Held, a French-Polish singer. The chanteuse arrived in New York in 1894
under contract with Florenz Ziegfeld. It
would be Held who suggested to the impresario that he stage an imitation of the
lavish Parisian Follies.
The beautiful singer checked into the New Netherlands in 1894 -- photograph from the collection of the New York Public Library |
But for now, the woman whom The Times called, “the
much-advertised French singer” checked into The New Netherlands Hotel. Among the diva’s demands was 40 gallons of
milk every day “for bathing purposes.”
Ziegfeld contracted with the Long Island milk merchant H. R. Wallace to
supply the milk at 20 cents a gallon.
“Miss Held had used 320 gallons, when she says she
discovered that it was not fresh, and lacked the ‘creamy’ quality essential,”
reported The New York Times on October 10, 1896. Anna Held refused to pay for the milk, so
Wallace sued her for the $64.
Victorian courtrooms were no place to air the subject of
naked women in tubs of milk. “Mr. Marks,
Miss Held’s personal representative, said yesterday that the matter would be settled
out of court, as milk baths were too peculiar to be discussed in public,”
reported The Times.
Despite the publicity about milk baths and Anna’s
questionable talents (The New York Times said “her abilities are of the most
ordinary kind…her voice is not sweet or very strong and she uses it with no
remarkable skill”), Ziegfeld was enamored with her. In the spring of 1897 the couple signed a
document in Anna’s suite in the New Netherlands proclaiming themselves married.
Although the “ceremony” had neither clergy nor public
official, it was witnessed by “Diamond” Jim Brady and Lillian Russell, and Florenz and Anna lived together as husband and wife for nearly sixteen years.
By the 1920s The New Netherlands was an anachronism among its modern neighbors. from the collection of the New York Public Library |
As the 20th century dawned, the hulking Victorian
hotels of a generation earlier lost favor.
In 1905, the Plaza Hotel was demolished and in its place Hardenberg’s
lavish new Plaza was erected. The
handsome French Renaissance palace stood in stark contrast to the dour
brick-and-brownstone New Netherlands across the plaza.
A sketch was released in 1926 depicting the coming replacement for the old hotel -- The Architect, October 1926 (copyright expired) |
In 1926, demolition of The New Netherlands began. It was replaced by the 38-story
Sherry-Netherland Hotel designed by Schultze & Weaver with Buchman &
Kahn. Now an apartment hotel, the
Sherry-Netherland survives as a familiar landmark for New Yorkers, few of whom are aware of
its magnificent namesake that stood here before it.
photo by Beyond My Ken |
I would be most interested to know if it was simply the exterior architecture of these Victorian hotels that fell out of favor or if something about their interior configerations made them incompatible with 1920's notions of comfort, convenience or luxury?
ReplyDeleteAnd I know that I am dating myself, but when I was a youngster (a VERY young younster) a post dentist treat was a visit to Trader Vic's, then ensconsed, I believe, at the Savoy Plaza next door to the Sherry Netherland.
Wow, I’m so curious what the interior of Hotel Savoy-Plaza was like?
DeleteHere is the rare, no very, very rare case on your blog where the replacement building exceeded the architectural beauty of the structure it replaced. The other 99.99% of the cases are unfortunately not so lucky.
ReplyDeletetook the words out of my mouth. Schulze and Weaver did nothing but EXTRAORDINARY work.
DeleteThank you Tom for your amazing work on this blog. I agree with the earlier commenters ... for once, a magnificent building was replaced with another magnificent building, instead of something mundane. The Sherry-Netherland is an impressive structure in its own right.
ReplyDeleteIn case anyone is interested, an 1891 article about the building, with floor plans, is freely available through Google books. Do a search on the hotel name specifically using Google *books*. This should take you to the relevant magazine article. The magazine is "Carpentry and Building," May 1891, pp. 112-114.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this astonishing article! As Anonymous said, the Netherlands hotel was replaced with something evenly great, so I cannot be mad. One must also not forget that the Fifth Avenue is a really important place in NYC, it's normal for the spots to change places if one offers better deal than the other. As a whole, I really love the story of the old NYC hotels, they have a life of their own.
ReplyDeleteThe hotels in NYC are an ever changing landscape. Some are getting demolished and others emerge. You just need to adapt to the situation. The Netherlands hotel has been a really memorable place in Manhattan,but things change all over us and we need to accept that. Great article with really amazing photos! Thanks for the good read.
ReplyDeleteWhat’s missing from this article is that the Sherry was destroyed by fire around 1927. Louis Sherry I believe rebuilt it and it became the Sherry Netherland combing the names. My step grandfather owned the Sherry from the 1950’s until at least his death in 1975. I loved working the revolving doors as a toddler!
ReplyDelete