photo by Alice Lum |
Historian Barbaralee Diamonstein-Spielvogel writes that the
dwelling was, most likely, constructed by carpenter Lawrence White. Its Flemish bond brickwork was distinguished
by handsome brownstone lintels with layered keystones above the openings. The completed house with its one or two
dormers perched on the simple cornice would have been one of several near
matching homes on the block.
Change came quickly to this section of Manhattan and by 1807
the elegant residential neighborhood of St. John’s Park had been developed a
few blocks north. As the city continued
to expand, residents fled northward ahead of the tide of commerce. St. John’s Park was essentially abandoned to
business by 1869 and the quaint little Federal homes on West Broadway had been
converted for commercial purposes. No.
177 had, by now, been altered for around three decades.
Commerce in the former house was, perhaps, a bit shadier
than that of its neighbors. The address
was reportedly a disorderly house for some time—the polite Victorian term for a
brothel.
Towards the turn of the century America was swept with a
Colonial Revival fever that resulted in neo-Federal and neo-Georgian churches
and homes. It would climax with stylish
mansions like that of Andrew Carnegie, and the high-toned Knickerbocker Club on
Fifth Avenue. It was most likely this architectural
trend that resulted in a nearly-seamless full-floor addition. Sometime around the early 1890s the attic
level was raised to a full third floor.
The architect copied the sills and lintels and applied a simple wooden
cornice appropriate to the period. He stopped
short of matching the Flemish bond brickwork.
More interesting than the astonishingly-sympathetic alteration
is that the little house was still there at all. Commercial structures had replaced nearly all
the Federal homes in the area; but somehow No. 177 clung on.
For many years Martin Mayer (sometimes spelled “Meyer”) ran
his restaurant from the ground floor.
The area now bustled with salesmen, messenger boys, and
deliverymen; making it a perfect location for his small business. It was one of two restaurants Mayer operated
in the area.
Martin Mayer’s respected image in the neighborhood resulted
in his name being used—inappropriately—by ex-City Chamberlain Charles H. Hyde He was facing
trial for swindling a client in 1911. Israel Tilden, a law student and clerk, applied for a change of venue, claiming that Hyde was so hated locally that he
could not receive a fair trial. To
support his application Tilden presented the court with an affidavit alleging that
local businessmen had disparaged Hyde, assumed he was guilty, and called him
unflattering names. Among the men listed
was Martin Mayer.
The problem for Tilden and his client was that at least a dozen of the men
learned of the affidavit and told reporters they had never made the remarks
attributed to them.
On December 27, 1911 a New York Times reporter visited Mayer
in his West Broadway restaurant. The man
who previously had not held an opinion in the swindling case had one now.
“Hyde is like the other crooks that can get away with
it. I never heard of this fellow Hyde
until several of my neighbors dropped in to ask me what I knew of the case,” he
snarled. “I am a very busy man. I have another restaurant to run as well as
this one, and my work takes all of my time.
I would not discuss the case with a stranger even if I was familiar with
it, and I am sure I would not call anybody the names I am supposed to have
called Mr. Hyde.”
Mayer was still operating his restaurant here in the
1920s. The success of his business was
reflected in the amount he pledged in support of a civic improvement project in
1923. Mayer, along with many of his
neighboring businessmen, was firmly in favor of demolishing the Sixth Avenue El
in favor of constructing a subway. He pledged
$118,000 that year towards the plan—about $1.5 million in today’s dollars.
photo by Alice Lum |
Romance and subsequent parenthood for the parrots came to an
abrupt end in March 1993 when the nightclub Renegayde opened in the adjoining
building. The thunderous music and
pulsing vibrations disturbed the tender ambiance of the parrots’ love nests and
the eggs stopped coming.
“It was immediate—they stopped completely,” Chambers
complained to Bruce Lambert of The New York Times a year later. It was a major problem for the breeder;
meaning she was forced to purchase her chicks.
Urban Bird eventually left, succeeded by the pet supply
store Pamper Ur Pets which remains there today.
One of the last surviving structures from the 1802-1805 period in
Tribeca, No. 177 West Broadway was considered for landmark designation on June
26, 2012. The building’s owner, Shiloh
Company LLC, sent its attorney to oppose the designation. Valerie Campbell argued that the structure
was heavily altered and did not consider the 110-year old third floor addition historic. The Landmarks Preservation Commission
agreed. Chairman Robert B. Tierney said
that the alterations “tipped it away from designation.”
But formally designated or not; No. 177 West Broadway is
indeed a landmark. A miraculous
survivor, it is the last relic of the neighborhood’s residential days two
centuries ago.
200 plus years of surviving in an urban commercial zone with typical alterations one would expect but not landmark worthy? The facade elements are all there. Thank God Landmarks Chairman Robert Tierney is finally being replaced after years of misguided demolitions throughout this city. The new Chairman, cannot be anymore toxic to NYC preservation efforts than Tierney has been.
ReplyDeleteMy thoughts exactly!
ReplyDelete