The newly-completed mansion in 1909 -- photograph by Wurts Bros. from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWTYUWVN&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915 |
When he was a child in Pittsburgh, few would suspect that Henry
Phipps would rise to become one of the richest and most powerful men in
America. The son of an immigrant shoe
maker, Henry was reared in a gritty and deprived neighborhood. His life would turn around when he partnered
with Andrew Carnegie to found a steelworks at the time when bridges, railroads,
and changing construction techniques demanded tons of steel.
As their fortunes grew, both Phipps and Carnegie donated
generously to the poorer class from which they themselves came. While Carnegie built free libraries so young
men could access learning; Phipps erected and endowed a hospital for “consumptives”
in Philadelphia; the largest facility for tuberculosis patients in the world. He paid for an agricultural college in India
where the poor “could be taught means to prevent the terrible famines that
every few years devastate the land and claim thousands of victims by
starvation,” said the San Francisco Call.
And, despite Phipps's close friendship with his partner (he named
his son Henry Carnegie Phipps), a moral disagreement between the men ended with
an expensive compromise. Carnegie’s
libraries were closed on Sundays. Phipps
believed they should be opened—at least during certain hours. So in 1890 he announced a gift of $20,000 to
the Carnegie Library in Allegheny, Pennsylvania for the purchase of books “with
the stipulation that the reading rooms be open from noon until 8 p.m.” on
Sundays.
Both Carnegie and Phipps moved to New York City at the turn
of the century and in 1901 the Carnegie Steel Company was purchased by J. P.
Morgan for $480 million—approximately $13.6 billion today. The New York Times later estimated Phipps’s
share in the sale as $100 million.
In 1899, Andrew Carnegie commissioned Babb, Cook &
Willard to design an immense neo-Georgian mansion across from Central Park and
rather north of the homes of other millionaires. His free-standing house would encompass the
entire block from 90th to 91st Street, surrounded by
lawns, gardens and a high decorative fence.
On January 9, 1901, The New York Times reported that Phipps
had purchased “a large plot at the northeast corner of Fifth Avenue and
Eighty-seventh Street, only three blocks distant from the site on which his
business associate, Andrew Carnegie, is erecting a magnificent mansion.” Phipps had paid Perry Belmont $500,000 for
the plot. But he was not done yet.
He simultaneously purchased the two adjoining building lots
on Fifth Avenue from E. H. Van Ingen & Co. for $200,000. He could now build on a site that measured
100 by 175 feet.
Ten days later, the Deseret Evening News reported that “Mr.
Phipps will at once begin construction of a mansion to cost $1,500,000.” That amount would translate to about $40 million today, not including the cost of the land.
Phipps recognized that the area around his building site
would draw Manhattan’s wealthiest citizens.
Already Perry Belmont had approved plans by Whitney Warren for his new
mansion on Fifth Avenue at the corner of 92nd Street; and William D.
Sloane had recently purchased land from Carnegie on 91st Street
where he would build two mansions for his married daughters. Five months later, Phipps purchased six lots
on the northeast corner of Fifth Avenue and 96th Street as “an
investment,” and the two old buildings at Nos. 7 and 9 East 87th
Street. The New York Times said he
purchased those two properties “to protect his new residence on the adjoining
Fifth Avenue corner. There is little
doubt that they will ultimately be replaced by modern dwellings of a design
agreeable to Mr. Phipps, and the transaction, together with several others of
similar character recently closed, are significant, as foreshadowing the fate
of all flats and antique dwellings on lots along the border of the upper Fifth
Avenue colony.”
Phipps chose the architectural firm of Trowbridge &
Livingston to design the mansion. Like
Carnegie’s residence, it would take years to complete. On February 12, 1905 The San Francisco Call
said “his new home, now being built, on the corner of Fifth avenue and
Eighty-seventh street, will be when finished one of the handsomest houses in
America…It is in Italian renaissance style of architecture.”
Four stories tall, while successfully appearing to be three,
the stately home sat far back from 87th Street and was approached by
a semi-circular carriage drive. To the
east a one-story wing called the “Orangerie” served as the conservatory. Interestingly, Phipps imported English
architect Alfred C. Bossom to design the interiors which may have been a
surprising contrast to the formal Italian façade. The San Francisco Call said “For the
furnishing of this superb house the fittings and furniture of an Indian palace
were bought outright by Mr. Phipps during a sojourn in India several years ago.”
On April 2, 1905, The New York Times published a sketch of
the house, showing a wooden fence surrounding the property. That would not last. In 1909 the Real Estate Record & Builders’
Guide reported that Henry Phipps had hired architect P. J. Mack to design a “brick
wall” at a cost of $100. The stately
enclosure would mimic the parapet and rooftop balustrade of the mansion.
One of Henry Phipps's Indian acquisitions sits in the staircase hall. A stained glass skylight illuminates the stairwell. photo by Wurts Bros. from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWT8TJKI&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915#/SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWT8TJKI&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915&PN=1 |
Earlier that year, Phipps had spent $1 million to establish a
fund for the construction of improved tenement houses for working class
families. The multimillionaire saw the
conditions which the lower classes endured and set out to improve them. “Mr. Phipps’ project, when pushed to the logical
conclusion which he has in mind, has for its object the complete regeneration
of the housing and sanitary conditions of fully three-fourths of the population
living on Manhattan Island. For notwithstanding
the fact that the present intent of the movement being inaugurated by his gift
is the alleviation of the miseries of the very poor in the abolishment of the
dark warrens where they are forced to live under c conditions all but
intolerable, the general effect of the bettering of such conditions must
ultimately bring with it an improvement in the housing facilities of every
family that lives in a flat or apartment house,” explained The San Francisco
Call.
Phipps' interest in things Indian is reflected in the unique coffered ceiling -- photo by Wurts Bros. from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWT8TJKI&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915#/SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWT8TJKI&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915&PN=1 |
Phipps and his family eventually moved into the mansion that
cost him, in total, around $2.5 million.
Almost immediately it was the scene of meetings and benefits for
philanthropic causes. On November 10,
1909, The Sun reported that the Tuberculosis Preventorium for Children was
organized in a meeting held in house. “The
plan of the new institution is to take from the tenements children who have
been infected with tuberculosis and restore them to normal health before it is
too late,” said the newspaper.
The "Orangerie" sat at the eastern edge of the property. Above it, a rooftop pergola offered evening respite from summer's stifling heat -- photograph by Wurts Bros. from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWTYUWVN&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915 |
A year earlier Phipps gave $500,000 to start a psychiatric
clinic at Johns Hopkins University to study mental diseases, and in 1909 gave $3
million to the University of Pennsylvania for tuberculosis research and
treatment.
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, it was common for real estate to be put
in the wife's name; thus ensuring financial stability in the case of
the husband’s death. It was surprising,
therefore, that it was not until April 21, 1915 that the title to the mansion
was transferred to Anne C. Phipps. The
Pittsburgh Press remarked, “Mrs. Henry Phipps is today the owner of the
$2,000,000 residence at the corner of Fifth ave. and Eighty-seventh st. The deed to the property is on file today and
shows that Mrs. Phipps paid her husband the nominal consideration of $100 for
the large corner plot, with its costly marble house.” The newspaper added “The Phipps house is one
of the show places of the finest part of the residential section of New York’s
leading avenue.”
Henry Phipps, who wore his beard similarly to his friend and former partner Andrew Carnegie, and his wife Anna -- photo from the collection of the Library of Congress |
Somewhat shockingly, that same year construction began on a
12-story apartment house abutting the Phipps property on 87th
Street. It signaled the beginning of a
disturbing trend which would soon pick up steam.
On September 30, 1916, Phipps hired Philadelphia architect
Horace Trumbauer to design the family’s country estate at Great Neck, Long
Island. Situated on 89 acres, it would
sit directly opposite Deepdale, the estate of William K. Vanderbilt, Jr.
A double-decker bus passes the Fifth Avenue side by the Phipps mansion on a still-tranquil Fifth Avenue -- photo from the collection of the Library of Congress |
The Phipps family had not lived in their marble mansion for
a full decade when, on April 8, 1917, The New York Times reported that Daniel
Guggenheim had purchased it. The
Philadelphia-born industrialist and his wife had just purchased Howard Gould’s
sprawling country estate Castle Gould on Long Island Sound.
Aggressive and determined, Guggenheim enlarged his family’s
mining and smelting holdings. At the
time of the purchase he and J. P. Morgan were pushing the neutral United States
to enter World War I. And after the
country did enter what was termed The Great War, change continued in Guggenheim’s
new neighborhood.
photograph by Wurts Bros. from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWTYUWVN&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915 |
On January 26, 1919, The New York Times reported on “the most
surprising feature of the realty market last week” which was “that Fifth Avenue
was to have another tall apartment house right in the heart of the choicest
residential section north of Fifty-ninth Street. To those who had hoped that this thoroughfare
would not again be invaded by apartment house construction for some time to
come, the fact that the site selected for immediate improvement was in the
Astor mansion block and that the high building will overtop the home of the
late Colonel John Jacob Astor, now owned by Vincent Astor, came with the
suddenness of a shock.”
The newspaper remembered “It was only a few years ago that
the conservative minded residents and owners on the avenue were somewhat
dismayed when a bold owner put up a twelve-story house adjoining the marble
residence of Henry Phipps…Apartment construction on upper Fifth Avenue would
appear to be as ruthless as that of commercial buildings in former home centres
prior to the enactment of the zoning law.”
Demolition workers remove the interiors of the Phipps Mansion in 1927 -- photograph by William J. Roege from the collection of the Museum of the City of New York http://collections.mcny.org/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWT8TJKI&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915#/SearchResult_VPage&VBID=24UAYWT8TJKI&SMLS=1&RW=1280&RH=915&PN=1 |
“Ruthless” was a well-chosen adjective. As the 1920s dawned, developers scrambled to
purchase and demolish the marble and granite palaces of Manhattan’s
millionaires. The lavish homes with
their costly materials were built to last for over a century, but survived only a
fraction of that time. Less than two
decades after the finishing touches were put on the Phipps mansion, it was
gone. Construction on the new apartment
house designed by J. E. R. Carpenter was begun in 1927 and finished a year
later.
I think this is the apartment house that replaced the Phipps mansion:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thecityreview.com/ues/fifave/fif1060.htm
NY:
ReplyDeleteAs a side note I believe the family careful disassembled the marble facade and had it stored for decades in Greenvale Long Island where it sat unused. Dont know what became of the materials but it was widely reported on up until about 2 decades ago. Would you know the outcome of this story? Also, I think some interior elements and the dining room paneling was also preserved and used in the Phipps family home on Long Island.
As of 2009, the Old Long Island website (which has tons of great images and is always a fun read), in 1930 the various parts of the facade were sent by Mrs. Phipps to her daughter Amy's estate "Templeton" at Brookville, where they still sit on a back lot slowly eroding away. I'd be interested to know about any interior sections that might have been saved as well.
DeleteThe material is under the Roslyn Bridge
DeleteDignified and handsome and light too. The stairwell was disassembled and used by daughter Amy Phipps Guest in her Long Island home, Templeton. Still there. The Dining Room was moved to son J. S. Phipps's Westbury House - now Old Westbury Gardens. Was the ballroom moved there too?
ReplyDeleteThe ballroom at Westbury House was created by their son Jay for the coming out of his daughter Dita. It was not made from items from his fathers NYC residence.
DeleteOne of my favorites of all the great New York City homes.
ReplyDeleteUnderstated elegance with surprising design twists. It was exquisite.
***
He sounds like a better man than some of the hyper-rich today -- and with better taste, too.
ReplyDeleteThese Fifth Avenue mansions were gorgeous but so short lived.The reasons for which mansions become obsolete in Manhattan are numerous and varied.First was the income tax after 1913.There was also the fact that the uber-wealthy Society spent most of their time in the country houses or travelling abroad on the new huge ocean liners.Newport, Palm Beach, Long Island with their resorts were very attractive.Of course the automobile changed things too, wealthy people had alot more mobility.You also had the "servant problem", you just couldnt get good help anymore.The costs of maintaining a large city residence were high.You needed a small army of servants which had wages .They werent as safe as the apartments.
ReplyDeleteOf course the grand apartment houses made a huge impact.Once the exlcusive residential(low-rise) sections of the city were invaded by these large structures the Avenues became very crowded, traffic increases exponentially.Developers started putting up palatial apartments with 15-20 rooms, which had high ceilings, fireplaces and layouts superior to that of a townhome.You had duplex apartments, maisonettes, and in the 20s penthouses, or roof apartments how they called them.They also offered numerous staff rooms, storage space.Many of them were simplexes, meaning you didnt have to go up and down the numerous flights of stairs all day long.Developers paid the mansion owners huge sums of money for their property, many times including a large apartment in the future building.
Also the social life had changed, wealthy people didnt entertain at home anymore, social clubs and hotels had better facilities for these activities.Ballrooms became unfashionable.The Gilded Age parties became less ostentatious, one didnt need an art gallery or music rooms, or reception rooms anymore.
And of course zoning laws changed.And here the geography of Manhattan Island is culpable too.Land was far too valuable to occupy a city plot with a single family residence.There was also the mentality, as in NYC people always embraced the new construction.Apartments were cutting edge, they had more light, a properly trained staff who made sure when you returned home from Newport the apartment was ready .If the building had a problem the live-in superintendent solved the problem.Also wealthy people started having less and less children.One didnt need 8 bedrooms anymore, 4-5 were sufficient and plenty of apartments provided that.Apartments had more bathrooms, more closet space, no stairs, and endless corridors.And i could keep on going.
In the end the single family residence never had a chance.The economy of an apartment was too superior.
Years later, Breaking news. The Times real estate story about Guggenheim purchasing the house seems to have fallen through, or been a mis-reporting. Social Registers in the years after show the Phippses to still be in residence, until they moved to the new building Henry Phipps built at 1 Sutton Place South in 1926, just before demolition started on the Fifth Avenue house in Feb. 1927.
ReplyDelete