The pinnacles of Marble Collegiate Church (one seen at far right) were nearly duplicated on the roof of the Bancroft Building. |
The Association’s minutes noted “The situation is healthy
and agreeable, central, and easily accessible from every direction, and it was
believed the property was not likely for a long time to come to depreciate in
value.” Regarding the mansion, the notes
called it “A brick building of substantial structure covered forty-five feet of
the width of the lots, and was of convenient depth. By property alterations, without undue
expense, it could, in the opinion of the Committee, be made adequate for the
purposes of the Association for several years to come.”
Indeed, the Association was in the mansion for several years—twenty,
to be exact. Then on October 1, 1895 it
sold the property as it prepared to move to its new headquarters that extended from
43rd to 44th Streets between Fifth and Sixth
Avenues. The buyer, real estate
developer Edward H. Van Ingen, paid $225,000 for the property, $25,000 below
asking price. The New York Times surmised
“The purchasers…will probably erect a business structure on the site.”
The New York Times was right. The 29th Street neighborhood was
no longer one of clubs and mansions.
Business buildings and hotels were now cropping up in the area. Van Ingen commissioned esteemed architect
Robert H. Robertson to design an eye-catching modern office building on the
site of the venerable mansion.
Robertson had become known for his own take on Romanesque
Revival in the previous decade. But for
what would become the Bancroft Building, he went in a completely different
direction. Completed in 1897, six
stories of red brick and white stone were sandwiched between a limestone top
floor and a three-story rusticated limestone base. The stone bands and voussoirs created a
vibrant contrast with the rich red brick—reminiscent of the popular Venetian
Gothic and Ruskinian Gothic styles of a generation earlier. Above it all, Robertson perhaps gave a friendly nod
to the Marble Collegiate Church next door, facing Fifth Avenue, by adding
near-matching pinnacles on the Bancroft roof.
Sturdy limestone piers and columns contrast with the light-hearted red and white treatment of the middle floors. |
With the building completed, Van Ingen was ready to cash
in. On August 25, 1897 he traded the
Bancroft Building for another plot ready for development. The New-York Tribune reported “The valuable
plot of land at Broadway and Thirty-ninth-st., on which it was intended to
build the Herald Square Hotel, was traded by Julien T. Davies to Edward H. Van
Ingen for the Bancroft Building and a sum of money.” The New York Times estimated the value of the
still-vacant Bancroft Building at “from $650,000 to $750,000."
Davies was quick to fill his new building. Among the first tenants were a surprising
number of architects. Two months later,
in January 1898, Architecture and Building commented “The Bancroft Building, 3,
5, and 7 West Twenty-ninth Street, New York, is about to become quite an
architectural centre. Mr. Henry Rutgers,
Marshall Babb, Cook & Willard, Parish & Schroeder and John E. Howe occupying
the entire ninth floor.”
J. B. Colt & Co., “prominent in the business of making
and selling projection lanterns and the like apparatus,” according to
Electrical Engineer, also moved in that year, and expanded into the “sale of
acetylene gas generators for the lighting of all kinds of buildings, etc. On account of this decision they are offering
special opportunities in price to buyers of projection apparatus, arc focusing
lamps, magic lanterns, stereopticons, slides and other accessories.” The J. B. Colt firm would be the first, but
not the last, tenant interested in the growing field of photography.
In March Knauth Brothers signed a five-year lease on the
store, basement and second floor. Manufacturers of surgical instruments the
23-year old firm had become what the Journal of Surgical Technology called “among
the foremost houses in the trade.” The
Journal commented on the new space in the Bancroft Building. “This establishment on Twenty-ninth street
embodies the latest sanitary and artistic construction, and the total amount of
space at the disposal of the firm equals about 30,000 square feet.”
In 1898 The Journal of Surgical Technology published photographs of Knauth Brothers' new space (copyright expired) |
Along with Knauth Brothers and the architectural firms came
a number of publishers. The Student
Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions moved in in 1898, publishers of "The
Student Missionary Appeal." The 563-page
volume reprinted addresses given at missionary conferences.
Publisher R. H. Russell was another new tenant. He took the entire sixth floor in March
(sharing it with the Cassler Magazine Company) and within the next few months
published Thomas Nelson Page’s “Two Prisoners,” “Poems,” by Robert Burns
Wilson, and “Shapes and Shadows,” a book of poems by Madison Cadwein among
others.
In January 1898 the International Committee of the Young Men’s
Christian Association leased the entire 10th Floor. By April the space was ready and the
organization moved in. The report of “The
Jubilee of Work for Young Men in North America” reported “This floor is
subdivided into a large number of offices occupied by secretaries of various
departments such as Publication, Business, Field, Railroad, Army and Navy,
Educational, Physical, Special Religious Work, and Boys’. Here also is the editorial office of
Association Men.”
A few days after the YMCA took the 10th floor, the Camera
Club of New York leased the entire 8th Floor; signing a lease of
five years. Two years earlier Alfred
Stieglitz, one of the principals of the club, had helped negotiate the merger
of the Camera Club with the Society of Amateur Photographers. The group was now among the wealthiest and
largest clubs in the nation. As a result
the space in the Bancroft Building not only included the expected darkrooms,
labs and camera equipment; it reportedly had all the amenities of an upscale club,
including a library.
From here Stieglitz published the quarterly Camera Notes
that included photogravures and half-tones.
The man who almost single-handedly raised photography from a hobby to an
art form was honored with an exhibition of his photography here from May 1 to May 15 in 1899.
The following year, on April 2, Frederick E. Partington
delivered a lecture for the benefit of the library fund of Vassar College in
the Camera Club rooms. Partington’s subject was
“Romantic France and the Pyrenees,” and was illustrated by “slides taken from
original photographs,” said The New York Times.
The newspaper noted that “There is a long list of prominent New York
women, most of them members of the alumnae association of the college, who are
patronesses.”
Meanwhile the Young Men's Christian Association International Committee had its hands full as the Boxer Uprising threatened missionaries in China. Erratic communication left the office unsure if some families of missionaries were safe and rescue parties were sent by steamer.
Reverand Horace Pitkin wrote to the office here on May 14, 1900 saying "Our guard of soldiers still come at night, but they will be of little service in case of actual outbreak. The morale of their presence is the only justification for keeping them." Miss Mary S. Morrill, writing from Pao-ting Foo, prompted other missionaries to keep their children in the safety of the schools "since their large feet would show forth the family connection with churches."
A variety of tenants, many of them architects and publishers, continued to come and go. In 1900 the American Swedenborg Printing and Publishing Society was here, as was the architectural firm of Hardy & Short. In 1903 the Moyea Automobile Company established its offices in the building and on May 1 of that year Frank Presbrey Company, “general advertising agents,” took over the entire 8th floor. The School Journal said at the time “This agency numbers among its patrons some of the most solid and representative advertisers in the world.”
Reverand Horace Pitkin wrote to the office here on May 14, 1900 saying "Our guard of soldiers still come at night, but they will be of little service in case of actual outbreak. The morale of their presence is the only justification for keeping them." Miss Mary S. Morrill, writing from Pao-ting Foo, prompted other missionaries to keep their children in the safety of the schools "since their large feet would show forth the family connection with churches."
A variety of tenants, many of them architects and publishers, continued to come and go. In 1900 the American Swedenborg Printing and Publishing Society was here, as was the architectural firm of Hardy & Short. In 1903 the Moyea Automobile Company established its offices in the building and on May 1 of that year Frank Presbrey Company, “general advertising agents,” took over the entire 8th floor. The School Journal said at the time “This agency numbers among its patrons some of the most solid and representative advertisers in the world.”
In 1911 when Hints, an entertainment magazine, moved into
its new quarters the Anthos Company was already doing business here. That company, run by Mrs. Millicent Searle,
sold patent remedies like Tonia, Ceratum, Baquilles, Elixir and Sal-Nutrient. Anthos representatives went door-to-door,
selling the tonics mostly to housewives.
The practice drew the suspicion of the County Medical Society.
Police matron Isabella Goodwin was sent undercover to work
for the firm. She later testified before
Chief Magistrate McAdoo that she would earn 20 cents for every dollar’s worth
of preparations she sold. She was advised
“to influence patients to take three to six months of treatment.” When she asked her supervisor whether she
should not merely suggest a month’s treatment, he responded “Are you a piker?”
One day when Goodwin arrived at the Bancroft Building office
feeling under the weather, she asked her supervisor if she should take one of
the preparations. She testified that he replied “No. Our medicines will do you no good. I take some of them now and then, because I
like the taste.”
Mrs. Searle was arraigned on the charge of illegally
practicing medicine on May 30, 1911.
On December 12, 1914 Julien T. Davies traded the Bancroft Building
for a new apartment building on Lexington Avenue and 72nd Street. The new owner was the E. A. L. Realty
Company. The firm would not hold the
property long and on February 11, 1916 The Times reported that the building’s
original owner, Edward H. Van Ingen “yesterday acquired the title in the
Bancroft Building.”
By now the millinery and apparel district was moving
northward from the Broadway district below 14th Street. In 1915 Eden Manufacturing Company was one of
the first of the clothing firms to move in.
In 1919 another publisher took space in the building. Gallon-Hall Corporation was the publisher of
Automotive Engineering.
That same year tenants Schwabach & Raphael, who were “engaged
in the cotton goods business,” according to The New York Times, purchased the
building from Van Ingren. The sale was
perhaps a reflection of the expanding garment district and other apparel firms
quickly moved in. Among them were C.
Reis, manufacturers of “cloaks, suits, waists and furs;” P. S. Farmer, resident
buyer of cloaks and suits; the Manhattan Petticoat Company; and Weisberg &
Zimmern.
In the second half of the 20th century Marble
Collegiate Church acquired the Bancroft Building. In 1961 a renovation was completed resulting
in meeting, religious, chapel and social rooms on the first floor and offices
and a Sunday school on the second. In
doing so a well-intentioned but ungainly and architecturally inappropriate
addition was erected at street level.
Concern over the preservation of architecturally or historically significant
structures has never been a hallmark of religious institutions and in the spring
of 2013 Marble Collegiate Church began plans to demolish the Bancroft
Building. In its place the church
envisioned an obtrusive glass slab with no context in the neighborhood.
The proposed new office tower -- NY.Curbed.com |
In June 2013 neighbors petitioned Community Board 5 and the
Landmarks Preservation Commission to designate the Bancroft Building a New York
City landmark. The battle over the
Victorian structure, not only an anomaly among Robertson designs but an
historic spot in the history of American photography—continues; although the
outlook for the Bancroft Building looks gloomy.
UPDATE: The Bancroft Building was demolished in 2015.
photographs taken by the author
many thanks to reader Ward Kelvin for requesting this post
This makes me want to cry.
ReplyDeleteIt's not like this is just a cookie-cutter turn-of-the-century building--it just doesn't look like anything else in the city. Replacing it with something so bland and generic is just adding insult to injury.
Religious organizations have and continue to be the worst owners and least interested tenants when it comes to preservation. There are countless examples in this city alone where the church sold off architecturally important buildings to turn a quick profit or undertook insensitive renovations obliterating historic and landmark worthy buildings. THis insane building plan is par for the course. I hope Landmarks has some backbone and rejects this glass box proposal
ReplyDeleteDestroying this historic, lovely building worsens the city for everyone else. The LPC should landmark it. Let the church find a way to reuse it.
ReplyDeleteThe Bancroft Building is a masterpiece with beautiful exterior decoration and one of the architectural jewels of the city. Wanting to replace this building with a building that is so rational, plain, and homogeneous seems nothing more than an aesthetic joke!
ReplyDelete