photo by Alice Lum |
In 1880 East 69th Street, between Fifth Avenue
and Madison Avenue was still mostly undeveloped. The situation would not last long and the blocks below 69th Street were filling as homeowners, now
recovering from the 1873 financial depression, ventured northward along Central
Park.
Little by little, starting with three speculative
rowhouses at Nos. 16 through 20, residences sprouted up on 69th
Street. The first three houses, erected by
architect and developer Charles Buek in 1880-81, would be joined in 1884 by the
residence of silk merchant August Richard.
By 1887 the block caught the eye of George J. McGourkey.
Born in Albany, McGourkey had come to New York at the age of
18, entering a Wall Street brokerage office.
His fortune grew as he became both a banker, affiliated with the Metropolitan
Bank, and an attorney, representing several railroads. Now,
aged 50, with the Metropolitan Bank having closed in 1884, he busied himself mostly
with closing up its affairs.
McGourkey purchased the building lot at No. 6 East 69th
Street and commissioned 32-year old John H. Duncan to design his new
townhouse. McGourkey’s choice was adventurous—the young
architect who would later become well known for designing Grant’s Tomb and the
Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Memorial Arch in Brooklyn’s Grand Army Plaza was still relatively
unknown.
The four-story house, completed in 1888, was an understated
expression of the McGourkey family’s social and financial status. The limestone base and English basement was
sparsely decorated with carved festoons over the entrance and parlor
window. A charming stone Juliette
balcony at the second floor was accessed by a door from the stairway hall. Duncan alternated bands of limestone with the
reddish-brown brick at this level, subtly blending the white base into the
brown upper stories. The third floor
windows were framed in delicate terra cotta; while the small arched windows and
engaged columns of the fourth floor gave a nod to the popular Romanesque
Revival style.
The first and second floors bowed gently outward. In 1889 the lot next door was still undeveloped -- The American Architect and Building News August 24, 1889 (copyright expired) |
The year that the McGourkeys moved in, George was elected
President of the American Meter Company.
The firm manufactured “all articles appertaining to the manufacture,
testing and distribution of gas,” according to its advertisements. These included wet gas meters, dry gas
meters, meter provers and portable test meters.
Unfortunately, McGourkey would not enjoy his new position
nor his new home for long. In 1891 he
retired due to failing health. A year
later, in December 1892 he died in the house on East 69th Street.
Charlotte McGourkey lived on in the house with her three
children. Young Samuel D. McGourkey went
on to become a partner in Pritchard & McGourkey, grain merchants, with an
office at 435 Produce Exchange.
Unmarried, he remained in the house with his mother as his career and
fortune grew. By 1911 he was a member of
the esteemed St. Nicholas, New York Athletic, and Canoe Clubs.
After three decades in the house at No. 6 East 69th
Street, Charlotte McGourkey died.
Samuel sold the house in February 1920 for $135,000—a little over $1
million today.
The buyer was Thomas M. Peters, a bachelor who had graduated
from Yale University in 1912 and served in Squadron A during the war. The successful Peters was a member of the
Yale, University, Downtown and City Clubs and owned a cattle ranch near Tucson,
Arizona.
In June 1926 his engagement to Marion Hood Post was
announced, deemed by The New York Times to be “of wide interest in society.” Marion was the granddaughter of the late
George B. Post, one of the preeminent architects of his day and of the late
General John Bell Hood of the Confederate Army.
Her uncle was architect George B. Post, Jr.
Following their marriage on July 10 that year, the newlyweds
returned to No. 6 East 69th Street, one of New York’s most enviable
addresses. The block which had been empty lots in
1880 was now shoulder-to-shoulder upscale homes of millionaires. The problem was not the address—it was the
house.
The eclectic architecture of 1888 was most definitely passé in
the Jazz Age. Along the block owners
called in architects to renovate their Victorian homes into modern, fashionable
dwellings. In 1928 Edwin C. Jameson’s
house, one of the original three on the block, was updated. A year later No. 16, owned by Edwin Jameson,
was given a Georgian façade by architect A. Wallace McCrea.
In 1936 Thomas Peters joined the trend. He hired his wife’s uncle to remodel both the
interior and exterior of the house. Whether
the resulting transformation was a good idea is arguable.
The now flat-faced building was remarkably unexceptional
architecturally. All traces of John
Duncan’s design were obliterated as the entrance with a pseudo-Federal doorway
was removed to the basement, a few steps below street level. George
Post clad the house in variegated Flemish-bond brick broken by two thin
limestone bandcourses. Among the
interior upgrades was an elevator.
The main entrance makes an errant stab at appearing Colonial -- photo by Alice Lum |
Little has changed to No. 6 East 69th Street since
then. A few of the surrounding mansions
were razed to make way for modern apartment buildings; but the block looks much
as it did just after Thomas Peters and some of his neighbors decided to update
their Victorian residences.
I am a LEGO enthusiast and your site is full of inspirational architecture! Thank you.
ReplyDeleteJust curious -- why does the caption under the historical photo say 8 East 86th Street?
ReplyDeleteOk. Your eyes are WAY better than mine, because I even used a magnifying glass and it still looks like 6 East 86th Street to me. But, if indeed it says "8" that is simply a misprint.
DeleteThe photo you featured is available online through St. Croix Architecture, which sells architectural prints. They have a blown up version of the address on their website, and it's definitely an 8. But I guess what I was really getting at is that it says "86th Street." Isn't your post about a house on 69th Street?
DeleteOh, right. I see that now. Got me. The house, the date, the owner, and the architect are all correct. But the address is without a doubt wrong. Go figure. I have no explanation for that one.
DeleteA late-19th century typesetter asleep at the switch, I suppose. Well, in any event, that was a great post, and I love that house (as it originally appeared, that is). It looks like the brick may have been Roman brick, which, especially when combined with limestone, gets me every time.
Delete